September 24, 2024
Since the start of 2024, Restaking has grown enormously in popularity. While EigenLayer continues to lead the way (around $15 billion in TVL), other competitors are emerging. Who will win this battle? That's the subject of this analysis.
Note: Between the drafting of this paper (August 2024) and its publication, EigenLayer announced a major update altering the nature of the competition between the two protocols. For clarity, we have added a dedicated section at the end of this analysis.
Restaking is one of the most captivating technological innovations in recent years in the field of securing and validating distributed networks. Introduced on Ethereum by EigenLayer, this sector has seen spectacular growth in 2024, reaching over $20 billion in total value locked (TVL) at its peak.
As with any promising sector, EigenLayer has seen the emergence of several competitors, with the most serious likely being Symbiotic. Backed by Paradigm and Cyber Fund, the fund led by the two co-founders of Lido Finance, Symbiotic quickly captured the market's attention, reaching a TVL of over $1 billion in less than a month.
Although EigenLayer pioneered the concept of Restaking, dissatisfaction among users, notably regarding the EIGEN airdrop and recent decisions to block access to U.S. and Canadian investors, has opened the door for competing protocols. In this analysis, we will examine the main differences between EigenLayer and Symbiotic, as well as the potential outcome of this "Restaking War."
The concept of Restaking was introduced by EigenLayer in 2022. The main idea is to allow investors to use their already-staked cryptocurrencies-either natively or in the form of liquid staking tokens-to secure other protocols within the Ethereum ecosystem.
This innovation aims to solve two critical issues on Ethereum: capital efficiency and the difficulty of developing a trust layer for decentralized protocols.
First, by allowing staked assets to be used for multiple functions, Restaking aims to significantly improve capital efficiency. Instead of requiring additional funds to secure each new protocol, thereby fragmenting available liquidity on Ethereum, the same tokens can be used to fuel a shared security layer.
Second, Restaking extends Ethereum's economic security to other distributed networks within the ecosystem, allowing them to borrow some of that security to build their own trust layer. This creates an ecosystem where security resources are amplified and pooled, reducing operational costs for distributed networks.
Announced in 2022, EigenLayer is the protocol that designed, introduced, and popularized the concept of Restaking. It operates as a marketplace where decentralized protocols within the Ethereum ecosystem can borrow the economic security of the main network in exchange for recurring payments.
EigenLayer raised over $164 million, including a final $100 million round led by Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) in February 2024. Since its official launch, EigenLayer has experienced exponential growth, reaching a TVL of $11.5 billion as of September 1, 2024.
Launched in 2024, Symbiotic is often seen as a direct response to EigenLayer’s rapid ascent. While the two protocols share many similarities, Symbiotic distinguishes itself in several key areas: modular and flexible architecture, permissionless nature, user deposit management, and collateral assets.
From the start, Symbiotic attracted considerable attention, raising $5.6 million from Paradigm and Cyber Fund. Just one month after its launch, the protocol had already captured over $1 billion in TVL.
EigenLayer extends Ethereum’s economic security to AVS by leveraging the existing validator network. The compatible assets are native Ether and its derivatives in the form of liquid staking tokens.
Symbiotic, on the other hand, offers a flexible model that allows various assets to be used as collateral (ERC-20 tokens, liquidity pool tokens, etc.). While this may attract more capital, it also increases the risks associated with asset volatility and longevity.
EigenLayer’s decision to limit itself to Ether and its derivatives reflects a desire to minimize risk while offering stable returns. Symbiotic, however, aims to attract a larger pool of investors and projects at the expense of the stability of restaking pools.
EigenLayer integrates seamlessly with Ethereum’s infrastructure, attracting all projects wishing to borrow a portion of the main network’s security rather than building their own trust layer. Since AVS (Actively Validated Services) are selected by EigenLayer, their number is limited, making the ecosystem relatively closed.
Symbiotic, however, aims to become a unifying capital layer for decentralized finance (DeFi), serving the security of a broader variety of projects. By allowing any decentralized application to integrate without approval, through its permissionless model, Symbiotic’s ecosystem is more open and could diversify more quickly.
However, this openness also increases the risk that one of the projects backed by Symbiotic could encounter problems. Whether it’s fraud or an attack, this could have devastating consequences for the entire ecosystem.
EigenLayer uses specific governance mechanisms to manage slashing and reward processes. These mechanisms include a Veto Slashing Committee (VSC), which makes centralized decisions on how to penalize malicious or deviant behavior. This approach is intentionally standardized and centralized to ensure better network integrity.
Symbiotic, by contrast, handles slashing directly at the vault level via "Resolvers." These are designated by networks and have more freedom to respond to the specific needs of each network. However, this also opens the door to potential malicious activities by Resolvers, or even collusion with networks to arbitrarily penalize operators.
EigenLayer’s philosophy is to extend Ethereum’s economic security to other protocols built on the main network, thereby strengthening the entire ecosystem. The goal is that each new protocol no longer has to build its own trust layer but can borrow Ethereum’s.
This is what EigenLayer’s founder refers to as "Fractured Trust": the more distributed networks based on Ethereum grow, the more liquidity is fragmented, thereby reducing the overall security of the main network. The Restaking concept, as presented by EigenLayer, is a direct solution to this problem. It creates a virtuous circle benefiting both Ethereum and distributed networks within its ecosystem.
Symbiotic, on the other hand, takes a different approach. Its goal is to create an open market for decentralized finance, where applications and protocols benefit from an influx of liquidity and users. Symbiotic’s vision focuses on maximizing returns and innovation while seeking to attract as many users as possible to compete with EigenLayer. However, the issue of "Fractured Trust" is not a priority, and Symbiotic’s operating model leads to capital outflows from Ethereum’s main network into distributed networks, resulting in a loss of security.
To recap, Symbiotic was officially launched on June 11th, the date when the company closed a $5.8 million funding round, led by Paradigm and Cyber Fund, an investment firm run by the two co-founders of Lido Finance. These two entities have specific reasons for funding a Restaking platform that competes with EigenLayer.
According to sources close to the team, Paradigm approached EigenLayer co-founder Sreeram Kannan to invest in the project. However, Kannan chose to turn to Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), Paradigm’s direct rival, to lead a $100 million funding round.
While EigenLayer was valued at $500 million, the protocol has grown so much that its fully diluted value during the EIGEN token launch is estimated to be around $13 billion. This represents a 25x increase from a16z’s initial investment, although the details of token distribution are not yet known.
The rivalry between these two venture capital firms is well known, likely explaining Paradigm’s motivation to invest in EigenLayer’s direct competitor, Symbiotic. However, this story also reveals another confrontation, this time between EigenLayer and Lido Finance.
The other major investor in Symbiotic is Cyber Fund, an investment fund co-founded by Konstantin Lomashuk and Vasiliy Shapovalov, who are also behind Lido Finance, a decentralized finance application. They clearly see EigenLayer’s success as a threat to their protocol’s dominance within the Ethereum ecosystem.
Moreover, Lido has been slow to enter Liquid Restaking, allowing Ether.fi and Swell to experience significant growth (with $5.7 billion and $1.5 billion in TVL, respectively). Numerous debates have occurred within the community about whether stETH should remain a Liquid Staking Token or become a Liquid Restaking Token.
Ultimately, the investment by the founders of Lido Finance in EigenLayer’s direct competitor is a strategy aimed at addressing these two issues while maintaining some sovereignty over their protocol and stETH.
There’s no doubt that Symbiotic has entered this "Restaking War" as a serious challenger to EigenLayer. The rivalry between the two protocols goes far beyond a simple battle to capture the largest share of a growing market; it is fueled by influential players and strategic stakes.
For some, this competition could benefit the ecosystem since it will drive innovation, regardless of the underlying motivations. Naturally, this innovation will be oriented towards satisfying users, which bodes well for their wallets: airdrops, better returns, etc.
Update (September 6, 2024): However, while the battle between Symbiotic and EigenLayer could be a catalyst for innovation, it could also distort the protocols. We are already starting to see this; Symbiotic’s rapid development and success have led to a strategic shift at EigenLayer, pushing it to accept all ERC-20 tokens, just like its competitor, which was not initially planned.
As of September 6, 2024, EigenLayer has officially launched "Permissionless Token Support," an update allowing any ERC-20 token to be added to the assets usable for Restaking. EigenLayer aims to allow AVS to choose to use their own tokens, stablecoins, or Bitcoin (BTC) derivatives.
This announcement directly contradicts EigenLayer’s philosophy as described in its whitepaper and by its founder in various blog posts. Indeed, EigenLayer stood out by aligning itself with Ethereum’s needs and philosophy, particularly by addressing the "Fractured Trust" issue.
When questioned about this on X (formerly Twitter), EigenLayer’s founder, Sreeram Kannan, responded that the idea of supporting ERC-20 tokens had already been mentioned in the project’s whitepaper in 2022, so today’s update should not come as a surprise.
Indeed, as outlined in EigenLayer’s key features (see sections above), an AVS can choose the quorum of stakers, i.e., the token distribution between ETH and their own token. Thus, as Sreeram notes, we were prepared for EigenLayer to support AVS’s ERC-20 tokens.
Nevertheless, implementing "Permissionless Token Support" also means that AVS will be able to select various ERC-20 tokens, such as stablecoins, Bitcoin derivatives, liquidity pool tokens, and many other potentially volatile and risky assets. In this sense, EigenLayer’s philosophy (as aligned as possible with Ethereum, unlike Symbiotic) seems somewhat compromised.
As explained earlier, the ability to support any ERC-20 token could lead to a loss of value for Ethereum in favor of distributed networks, an effect that EigenLayer specifically sought to avoid.
This update raises questions about EigenLayer’s ambitions and the outcome of the war between the two protocols. Symbiotic’s growth in the market appears to have significantly influenced its competitor’s decisions, and we will closely monitor the coming months.