Aptos vs Arbitrum
Compare Aptos and Arbitrum on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$44.04M
Aptos is a Layer‑1 written in Rust that uses the Move language and AptosBFT v4—a Diem‑derived HotStuff variant—to finalise blocks in less than 1 second. Its Block‑STM executor runs transactions in parallel and abort‑reexecutes on conflict, achieving > 100k TPS in public benchmarks. The 2024 ‘Quorum Store’ upgrade optimised mempool sharding and reduced latency under network partition.
View Full Page$1.407B
Arbitrum One and Nova are optimistic rollups using Nitro fraud proofs that compress transactions into calldata submitted to Ethereum. The Orbit toolkit lets projects deploy their own Arbitrum Orbit chains with configurable permissions. ARB token governance manages the 3 000‑plus validator whitelist and a 1 billion‑dollar ecosystem grant fund.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Aptos
TVL$44.04M
24h Volume$5.48M
24h Fees$51K
24h Revenue$31.9K
30d Fees$1.34M
30d Revenue$670.4K
7d TVL Change+0.99%
Dominance0.02%
Arbitrum
TVL$1.407B
24h Volume$271.24M
24h Fees$2.3M
24h Revenue$149.4K
30d Fees$20.08M
30d Revenue$4.29M
7d TVL Change+4.27%
Dominance0.50%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Aptos
3.0%Arbitrum
97.0%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Aptos
2.0%Arbitrum
98.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Aptos
2.2%Arbitrum
97.8%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Aptos
17.6%Arbitrum
82.4%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Aptos
0.99%Arbitrum
4.27%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Aptos
0.0%Arbitrum
0.5%TVL Comparison
Aptos
Arbitrum