Aptos vs Arbitrum
Compare Aptos and Arbitrum on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$55.45M
Aptos is a Layer‑1 written in Rust that uses the Move language and AptosBFT v4—a Diem‑derived HotStuff variant—to finalise blocks in less than 1 second. Its Block‑STM executor runs transactions in parallel and abort‑reexecutes on conflict, achieving > 100k TPS in public benchmarks. The 2024 ‘Quorum Store’ upgrade optimised mempool sharding and reduced latency under network partition.
View Full Page$1.388B
Arbitrum One and Nova are optimistic rollups using Nitro fraud proofs that compress transactions into calldata submitted to Ethereum. The Orbit toolkit lets projects deploy their own Arbitrum Orbit chains with configurable permissions. ARB token governance manages the 3 000‑plus validator whitelist and a 1 billion‑dollar ecosystem grant fund.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Aptos
TVL$55.45M
24h Volume$63.33M
24h Fees$163.2K
24h Revenue$52.2K
30d Fees$5.21M
30d Revenue$1.67M
7d TVL Change-8.37%
Dominance0.02%
Arbitrum
TVL$1.388B
24h Volume$19.96M
24h Fees$64.8K
24h Revenue$12.9K
30d Fees$4.03M
30d Revenue$1.14M
7d TVL Change-1.21%
Dominance0.50%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Aptos
3.8%Arbitrum
96.2%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Aptos
76.0%Arbitrum
24.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Aptos
71.6%Arbitrum
28.4%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Aptos
80.2%Arbitrum
19.8%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Aptos
-8.37%Arbitrum
-1.21%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Aptos
0.0%Arbitrum
0.5%TVL Comparison
Aptos
Arbitrum