Aptos vs Arc

Compare Aptos and Arc on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$43.38M
Aptos is a Layer‑1 written in Rust that uses the Move language and AptosBFT v4—a Diem‑derived HotStuff variant—to finalise blocks in less than 1 second. Its Block‑STM executor runs transactions in parallel and abort‑reexecutes on conflict, achieving > 100k TPS in public benchmarks. The 2024 ‘Quorum Store’ upgrade optimised mempool sharding and reduced latency under network partition.
View Full Page
$536.27M
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Aptos
TVL
$43.38M
24h Volume
$5.5M
24h Fees
$41.2K
24h Revenue
$22.2K
30d Fees
$1.31M
30d Revenue
$643.6K
7d TVL Change
-0.77%
Dominance
0.05%
Arc
TVL
$536.27M
24h Volume
$22.75M
24h Fees
$79.3K
24h Revenue
$4.1K
30d Fees
$5.9M
30d Revenue
$492.2K
7d TVL Change
-4.14%
Dominance
0.58%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Aptos
7.5%
Arc
92.5%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Aptos
19.5%
Arc
80.5%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Aptos
34.2%
Arc
65.8%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Aptos
84.5%
Arc
15.5%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Aptos
-0.77%
Arc
-4.14%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Aptos
0.0%
Arc
0.6%
TVL Comparison
Aptos
Arc