Aptos vs Avalanche

Compare Aptos and Avalanche on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$53.3M
Aptos is a Layer‑1 written in Rust that uses the Move language and AptosBFT v4—a Diem‑derived HotStuff variant—to finalise blocks in less than 1 second. Its Block‑STM executor runs transactions in parallel and abort‑reexecutes on conflict, achieving > 100k TPS in public benchmarks. The 2024 ‘Quorum Store’ upgrade optimised mempool sharding and reduced latency under network partition.
View Full Page
$467.09M
Avalanche implements Snowman consensus on its C‑Chain (EVM) and runs a multi‑chain architecture with X‑Chain (UTXO) and P‑Chain (staking). Custom subnets allow projects like DeFi Kingdoms and Intain RWA to spin up their own validator sets with whitelisted tokens. The 2025 Banff hard fork added elastic subnets with dynamic validator staking for improved security sharing.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Aptos
TVL
$53.3M
24h Volume
$66.34M
24h Fees
$164K
24h Revenue
$52.5K
30d Fees
$5.58M
30d Revenue
$1.79M
7d TVL Change
-5.22%
Dominance
0.02%
Avalanche
TVL
$467.09M
24h Volume
$77.83M
24h Fees
$24.8K
24h Revenue
$7.5K
30d Fees
$4.47M
30d Revenue
$950.9K
7d TVL Change
-7.04%
Dominance
0.18%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Aptos
10.2%
Avalanche
89.8%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Aptos
46.0%
Avalanche
54.0%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Aptos
86.9%
Avalanche
13.1%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Aptos
87.4%
Avalanche
12.6%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Aptos
-5.22%
Avalanche
-7.04%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Aptos
0.0%
Avalanche
0.2%
TVL Comparison
Aptos
Avalanche