Aptos vs BSC

Compare Aptos and BSC on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$55.35M
Aptos is a Layer‑1 written in Rust that uses the Move language and AptosBFT v4—a Diem‑derived HotStuff variant—to finalise blocks in less than 1 second. Its Block‑STM executor runs transactions in parallel and abort‑reexecutes on conflict, achieving > 100k TPS in public benchmarks. The 2024 ‘Quorum Store’ upgrade optimised mempool sharding and reduced latency under network partition.
View Full Page
$5.472B
BNB Smart Chain is an EVM network secured by Proof‑of‑Staked Authority where 21 validators rotate every epoch, offering 3‑second block times. Projects benefit from low fees (< $0.05) and a vast ecosystem seeded by Binance Launchpad. The 2024 Moran upgrade implemented the BEP‑336 blob transaction format akin to Ethereum’s EIP‑4844.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Aptos
TVL
$55.35M
24h Volume
$63.33M
24h Fees
$163.2K
24h Revenue
$52.2K
30d Fees
$5.21M
30d Revenue
$1.67M
7d TVL Change
-7.98%
Dominance
0.02%
BSC
TVL
$5.472B
24h Volume
$30.63M
24h Fees
$8.3K
24h Revenue
$4.2K
30d Fees
$4.03M
30d Revenue
$1.14M
7d TVL Change
-3.37%
Dominance
1.97%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Aptos
1.0%
BSC
99.0%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Aptos
67.4%
BSC
32.6%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Aptos
95.1%
BSC
4.9%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Aptos
92.5%
BSC
7.5%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Aptos
-7.98%
BSC
-3.37%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Aptos
0.0%
BSC
2.0%
TVL Comparison
Aptos
BSC