Aptos vs BSC

Compare Aptos and BSC on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$54.54M
Aptos is a Layer‑1 written in Rust that uses the Move language and AptosBFT v4—a Diem‑derived HotStuff variant—to finalise blocks in less than 1 second. Its Block‑STM executor runs transactions in parallel and abort‑reexecutes on conflict, achieving > 100k TPS in public benchmarks. The 2024 ‘Quorum Store’ upgrade optimised mempool sharding and reduced latency under network partition.
View Full Page
$5.641B
BNB Smart Chain is an EVM network secured by Proof‑of‑Staked Authority where 21 validators rotate every epoch, offering 3‑second block times. Projects benefit from low fees (< $0.05) and a vast ecosystem seeded by Binance Launchpad. The 2024 Moran upgrade implemented the BEP‑336 blob transaction format akin to Ethereum’s EIP‑4844.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Aptos
TVL
$54.54M
24h Volume
$45.71M
24h Fees
$113.6K
24h Revenue
$36.3K
30d Fees
$5.8M
30d Revenue
$1.86M
7d TVL Change
-4.02%
Dominance
0.02%
BSC
TVL
$5.641B
24h Volume
$77.16M
24h Fees
$65.9K
24h Revenue
$11.2K
30d Fees
$4.16M
30d Revenue
$924.5K
7d TVL Change
+2.53%
Dominance
1.95%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Aptos
1.0%
BSC
99.0%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Aptos
37.2%
BSC
62.8%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Aptos
63.3%
BSC
36.7%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Aptos
76.4%
BSC
23.6%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Aptos
-4.02%
BSC
2.53%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Aptos
0.0%
BSC
2.0%
TVL Comparison
Aptos
BSC