Aptos vs Injective
Compare Aptos and Injective on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$44.12M
Aptos is a Layer‑1 written in Rust that uses the Move language and AptosBFT v4—a Diem‑derived HotStuff variant—to finalise blocks in less than 1 second. Its Block‑STM executor runs transactions in parallel and abort‑reexecutes on conflict, achieving > 100k TPS in public benchmarks. The 2024 ‘Quorum Store’ upgrade optimised mempool sharding and reduced latency under network partition.
View Full Page$14.57M
Injective is a Cosmos‑SDK Layer‑1 with on‑chain order books, zero‑gas trading and a frequent batch auction that mitigates MEV. Its built‑in Ethereum bridge lets users bring ERC‑20s without custodial risk, and the WasmX module supports CosmWasm smart contracts. INJ holders can stake or participate in governance that controls upgrades like the 2024 Volan hard fork which added liquid staking.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Aptos
TVL$44.12M
24h Volume$7.25M
24h Fees$54K
24h Revenue$24.7K
30d Fees$1.36M
30d Revenue$676.7K
7d TVL Change+0.19%
Dominance0.02%
Injective
TVL$14.57M
24h Volume$5.03M
24h Fees$488
24h Revenue$151
30d Fees$33.7K
30d Revenue$8.7K
7d TVL Change+20.34%
Dominance0.01%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Aptos
75.2%Injective
24.8%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Aptos
59.0%Injective
41.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Aptos
99.1%Injective
1.0%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Aptos
99.4%Injective
1.0%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Aptos
0.19%Injective
20.34%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Aptos
0.0%Injective
0.0%TVL Comparison
Aptos
Injective