Aptos vs Injective
Compare Aptos and Injective on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$55.45M
Aptos is a Layer‑1 written in Rust that uses the Move language and AptosBFT v4—a Diem‑derived HotStuff variant—to finalise blocks in less than 1 second. Its Block‑STM executor runs transactions in parallel and abort‑reexecutes on conflict, achieving > 100k TPS in public benchmarks. The 2024 ‘Quorum Store’ upgrade optimised mempool sharding and reduced latency under network partition.
View Full Page$9.23M
Injective is a Cosmos‑SDK Layer‑1 with on‑chain order books, zero‑gas trading and a frequent batch auction that mitigates MEV. Its built‑in Ethereum bridge lets users bring ERC‑20s without custodial risk, and the WasmX module supports CosmWasm smart contracts. INJ holders can stake or participate in governance that controls upgrades like the 2024 Volan hard fork which added liquid staking.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Aptos
TVL$55.45M
24h Volume$63.33M
24h Fees$163.2K
24h Revenue$52.2K
30d Fees$5.21M
30d Revenue$1.67M
7d TVL Change-8.37%
Dominance0.02%
Injective
TVL$9.23M
24h Volume$56.3K
24h Fees$21.3K
24h Revenue$21.3K
30d Fees$487.4K
30d Revenue$487.4K
7d TVL Change-15.17%
Dominance0.00%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Aptos
85.7%Injective
14.3%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Aptos
99.9%Injective
1.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Aptos
88.4%Injective
11.6%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Aptos
71.0%Injective
29.0%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Aptos
-8.37%Injective
-15.17%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Aptos
0.0%Injective
0.0%TVL Comparison
Aptos
Injective