Aptos vs Ink
Compare Aptos and Ink on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$55.35M
Aptos is a Layer‑1 written in Rust that uses the Move language and AptosBFT v4—a Diem‑derived HotStuff variant—to finalise blocks in less than 1 second. Its Block‑STM executor runs transactions in parallel and abort‑reexecutes on conflict, achieving > 100k TPS in public benchmarks. The 2024 ‘Quorum Store’ upgrade optimised mempool sharding and reduced latency under network partition.
View Full Page$151.72M
Ink is Kraken's Ethereum OP Stack Layer-2 built as a DeFi-focused member of the Optimism Superchain. It offers EVM compatibility, low fees and one-second blocks from launch, with sub-second blocks planned, so builders can deploy lending, DEX and yield applications close to Kraken's user base. No dedicated Ink token is mapped yet, so the blockchain is imported without an associated token.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Aptos
TVL$55.35M
24h Volume$63.33M
24h Fees$163.2K
24h Revenue$52.2K
30d Fees$5.21M
30d Revenue$1.67M
7d TVL Change-7.98%
Dominance0.02%
Ink
TVL$151.72M
24h Volume$26.02M
24h Fees$6.2K
24h Revenue$3.2K
30d Fees$4.03M
30d Revenue$1.14M
7d TVL Change+4.35%
Dominance0.05%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Aptos
26.7%Ink
73.3%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Aptos
70.9%Ink
29.1%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Aptos
96.3%Ink
3.7%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Aptos
94.3%Ink
5.7%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Aptos
-7.98%Ink
4.35%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Aptos
0.0%Ink
0.1%TVL Comparison
Aptos
Ink