Aptos vs Linea

Compare Aptos and Linea on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$44.12M
Aptos is a Layer‑1 written in Rust that uses the Move language and AptosBFT v4—a Diem‑derived HotStuff variant—to finalise blocks in less than 1 second. Its Block‑STM executor runs transactions in parallel and abort‑reexecutes on conflict, achieving > 100k TPS in public benchmarks. The 2024 ‘Quorum Store’ upgrade optimised mempool sharding and reduced latency under network partition.
View Full Page
$23.8M
Linea is Consensys’ zkEVM rollup offering bytecode‑level equivalence with Ethereum and zero‑knowledge proofs generated by the Scroll‑inspired ‘Plonky3’ prover. The network is integrated directly into MetaMask, and sequencer fees can be paid in any ERC‑20 via a paymaster contract. Linea has secured over 200 million TVL and finalises proofs on mainnet every 10 minutes.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Aptos
TVL
$44.12M
24h Volume
$7.25M
24h Fees
$54K
24h Revenue
$24.7K
30d Fees
$1.36M
30d Revenue
$676.7K
7d TVL Change
+0.19%
Dominance
0.02%
Linea
TVL
$23.8M
24h Volume
$321.7K
24h Fees
$1.3K
24h Revenue
$593
30d Fees
$63.5K
30d Revenue
$39.9K
7d TVL Change
-3.30%
Dominance
0.01%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Aptos
65.0%
Linea
35.0%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Aptos
95.8%
Linea
4.2%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Aptos
97.7%
Linea
2.3%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Aptos
97.6%
Linea
2.4%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Aptos
0.19%
Linea
-3.30%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Aptos
0.0%
Linea
0.0%
TVL Comparison
Aptos
Linea