Aptos vs Manta

Compare Aptos and Manta on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$54.54M
Aptos is a Layer‑1 written in Rust that uses the Move language and AptosBFT v4—a Diem‑derived HotStuff variant—to finalise blocks in less than 1 second. Its Block‑STM executor runs transactions in parallel and abort‑reexecutes on conflict, achieving > 100k TPS in public benchmarks. The 2024 ‘Quorum Store’ upgrade optimised mempool sharding and reduced latency under network partition.
View Full Page
$3.46M
Manta Pacific is a modular zk‑EVM Layer‑2 that stores rollup data on Celestia DA and uses universal circuits to keep prover costs low. Users can deploy privacy‑preserving smart contracts with built‑in zero‑knowledge widgets for shielding balances. The 2025 ‘Marlin’ release adds Account Abstraction and native bridges to Polkadot’s parachain ecosystem.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Aptos
TVL
$54.54M
24h Volume
$45.71M
24h Fees
$113.6K
24h Revenue
$36.3K
30d Fees
$5.8M
30d Revenue
$1.86M
7d TVL Change
-4.02%
Dominance
0.02%
Manta
TVL
$3.46M
24h Volume
$4.42M
24h Fees
$565
24h Revenue
$91
30d Fees
$51.4K
30d Revenue
$6.9K
7d TVL Change
+0.46%
Dominance
0.00%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Aptos
94.0%
Manta
6.0%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Aptos
91.2%
Manta
8.8%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Aptos
99.5%
Manta
1.0%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Aptos
99.7%
Manta
1.0%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Aptos
-4.02%
Manta
0.46%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Aptos
0.0%
Manta
0.0%
TVL Comparison
Aptos
Manta