Aptos vs Manta
Compare Aptos and Manta on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$55.35M
Aptos is a Layer‑1 written in Rust that uses the Move language and AptosBFT v4—a Diem‑derived HotStuff variant—to finalise blocks in less than 1 second. Its Block‑STM executor runs transactions in parallel and abort‑reexecutes on conflict, achieving > 100k TPS in public benchmarks. The 2024 ‘Quorum Store’ upgrade optimised mempool sharding and reduced latency under network partition.
View Full Page$3.46M
Manta Pacific is a modular zk‑EVM Layer‑2 that stores rollup data on Celestia DA and uses universal circuits to keep prover costs low. Users can deploy privacy‑preserving smart contracts with built‑in zero‑knowledge widgets for shielding balances. The 2025 ‘Marlin’ release adds Account Abstraction and native bridges to Polkadot’s parachain ecosystem.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Aptos
TVL$55.35M
24h Volume$63.33M
24h Fees$163.2K
24h Revenue$52.2K
30d Fees$5.21M
30d Revenue$1.67M
7d TVL Change-7.98%
Dominance0.02%
Manta
TVL$3.46M
24h Volume$9.94M
24h Fees$3.8K
24h Revenue$1.1K
30d Fees$41.8K
30d Revenue$6.2K
7d TVL Change-6.11%
Dominance0.00%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Aptos
94.1%Manta
5.9%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Aptos
86.4%Manta
13.6%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Aptos
97.8%Manta
2.2%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Aptos
97.9%Manta
2.1%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Aptos
-7.98%Manta
-6.11%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Aptos
0.0%Manta
0.0%TVL Comparison
Aptos
Manta