Aptos vs MegaETH

Compare Aptos and MegaETH on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$55.35M
Aptos is a Layer‑1 written in Rust that uses the Move language and AptosBFT v4—a Diem‑derived HotStuff variant—to finalise blocks in less than 1 second. Its Block‑STM executor runs transactions in parallel and abort‑reexecutes on conflict, achieving > 100k TPS in public benchmarks. The 2024 ‘Quorum Store’ upgrade optimised mempool sharding and reduced latency under network partition.
View Full Page
$43.04M
MegaETH is an Ethereum Layer-2 designed as a real-time blockchain, with documentation highlighting roughly 10 ms block times and real-time transaction processing. It keeps the EVM developer surface while redesigning execution, mini-blocks and settlement around low-latency applications. The network uses chain ID 4326 and has MEGA as its associated CoinGecko token.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Aptos
TVL
$55.35M
24h Volume
$63.33M
24h Fees
$163.2K
24h Revenue
$52.2K
30d Fees
$5.21M
30d Revenue
$1.67M
7d TVL Change
-7.98%
Dominance
0.02%
MegaETH
TVL
$43.04M
24h Volume
$1.22B
24h Fees
$13.7K
24h Revenue
$10.6K
30d Fees
$407.3K
30d Revenue
$327K
7d TVL Change
-0.97%
Dominance
0.02%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Aptos
56.3%
MegaETH
43.7%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Aptos
4.9%
MegaETH
95.1%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Aptos
92.2%
MegaETH
7.8%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Aptos
83.1%
MegaETH
16.9%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Aptos
-7.98%
MegaETH
-0.97%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Aptos
0.0%
MegaETH
0.0%
TVL Comparison
Aptos
MegaETH