Aptos vs Movement

Compare Aptos and Movement on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$55.35M
Aptos is a Layer‑1 written in Rust that uses the Move language and AptosBFT v4—a Diem‑derived HotStuff variant—to finalise blocks in less than 1 second. Its Block‑STM executor runs transactions in parallel and abort‑reexecutes on conflict, achieving > 100k TPS in public benchmarks. The 2024 ‘Quorum Store’ upgrade optimised mempool sharding and reduced latency under network partition.
View Full Page
$3.04M
Movement is a Move-based blockchain network designed to bring the security and performance of the Move programming language to the Ethereum ecosystem. Built with a modular architecture, it combines MoveVM execution with Ethereum compatibility, enabling developers to build scalable decentralized applications while accessing Ethereum’s liquidity and infrastructure. Movement focuses on high throughput, fast finality, and interoperability between Move and EVM ecosystems.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Aptos
TVL
$55.35M
24h Volume
$63.33M
24h Fees
$163.2K
24h Revenue
$52.2K
30d Fees
$5.21M
30d Revenue
$1.67M
7d TVL Change
-7.98%
Dominance
0.02%
Movement
TVL
$3.04M
24h Volume
$1.2K
24h Fees
$1.6K
24h Revenue
$589
30d Fees
$64.7K
30d Revenue
$23.9K
7d TVL Change
-16.82%
Dominance
0.00%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Aptos
94.8%
Movement
5.2%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Aptos
100.0%
Movement
1.0%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Aptos
99.0%
Movement
1.0%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Aptos
98.9%
Movement
1.1%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Aptos
-7.98%
Movement
-16.82%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Aptos
0.0%
Movement
0.0%
TVL Comparison
Aptos
Movement