Aptos vs Movement
Compare Aptos and Movement on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$44.04M
Aptos is a Layer‑1 written in Rust that uses the Move language and AptosBFT v4—a Diem‑derived HotStuff variant—to finalise blocks in less than 1 second. Its Block‑STM executor runs transactions in parallel and abort‑reexecutes on conflict, achieving > 100k TPS in public benchmarks. The 2024 ‘Quorum Store’ upgrade optimised mempool sharding and reduced latency under network partition.
View Full Page$2.58M
Movement is a Move-based blockchain network designed to bring the security and performance of the Move programming language to the Ethereum ecosystem. Built with a modular architecture, it combines MoveVM execution with Ethereum compatibility, enabling developers to build scalable decentralized applications while accessing Ethereum’s liquidity and infrastructure. Movement focuses on high throughput, fast finality, and interoperability between Move and EVM ecosystems.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Aptos
TVL$44.04M
24h Volume$5.48M
24h Fees$51K
24h Revenue$31.9K
30d Fees$1.34M
30d Revenue$670.4K
7d TVL Change+0.99%
Dominance0.02%
Movement
TVL$2.58M
24h Volume$21.4K
24h Fees$151
24h Revenue$49
30d Fees$1.3K
30d Revenue$427
7d TVL Change-4.59%
Dominance0.00%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Aptos
94.5%Movement
5.5%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Aptos
99.6%Movement
1.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Aptos
99.7%Movement
1.0%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Aptos
99.8%Movement
1.0%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Aptos
0.99%Movement
-4.59%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Aptos
0.0%Movement
0.0%TVL Comparison
Aptos
Movement