Aptos vs Pharos

Compare Aptos and Pharos on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$43.38M
Aptos is a Layer‑1 written in Rust that uses the Move language and AptosBFT v4—a Diem‑derived HotStuff variant—to finalise blocks in less than 1 second. Its Block‑STM executor runs transactions in parallel and abort‑reexecutes on conflict, achieving > 100k TPS in public benchmarks. The 2024 ‘Quorum Store’ upgrade optimised mempool sharding and reduced latency under network partition.
View Full Page
$73.14M
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Aptos
TVL
$43.38M
24h Volume
$5.5M
24h Fees
$41.2K
24h Revenue
$22.2K
30d Fees
$1.31M
30d Revenue
$643.6K
7d TVL Change
-0.77%
Dominance
0.05%
Pharos
TVL
$73.14M
24h Volume
$0
24h Fees
$9.8K
24h Revenue
$220
30d Fees
$311.2K
30d Revenue
$4.8K
7d TVL Change
-0.62%
Dominance
0.08%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Aptos
37.2%
Pharos
62.8%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Aptos
100.0%
Pharos
1.0%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Aptos
80.8%
Pharos
19.2%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Aptos
99.0%
Pharos
1.0%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Aptos
-0.77%
Pharos
-0.62%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Aptos
0.0%
Pharos
0.1%
TVL Comparison
Aptos
Pharos