Aptos vs Sei
Compare Aptos and Sei on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$53.7M
Aptos is a Layer‑1 written in Rust that uses the Move language and AptosBFT v4—a Diem‑derived HotStuff variant—to finalise blocks in less than 1 second. Its Block‑STM executor runs transactions in parallel and abort‑reexecutes on conflict, achieving > 100k TPS in public benchmarks. The 2024 ‘Quorum Store’ upgrade optimised mempool sharding and reduced latency under network partition.
View Full Page$30.41M
Sei is a parallelised Cosmos‑SDK Layer‑1 optimized for order‑book exchanges, using Twin‑Turbo consensus to reach 300–400 ms finality. Its built‑in matching engine lets dApps compose on a shared liquidity layer, and fee markets are denominated in SEI with bulk‑order discounts. The ‘V2’ upgrade adds EVM compatibility via SeiDB and WASM contracts side‑by‑side.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Aptos
TVL$53.7M
24h Volume$66.34M
24h Fees$164K
24h Revenue$52.5K
30d Fees$5.58M
30d Revenue$1.79M
7d TVL Change-5.22%
Dominance0.02%
Sei
TVL$30.41M
24h Volume$1.417B
24h Fees$1.4K
24h Revenue$3
30d Fees$53K
30d Revenue$7.5K
7d TVL Change-6.87%
Dominance0.01%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Aptos
63.8%Sei
36.2%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Aptos
4.5%Sei
95.5%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Aptos
99.1%Sei
1.0%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Aptos
100.0%Sei
1.0%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Aptos
-5.22%Sei
-6.87%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Aptos
0.0%Sei
0.0%TVL Comparison
Aptos
Sei