Aptos vs Solana

Compare Aptos and Solana on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$55.44M
Aptos is a Layer‑1 written in Rust that uses the Move language and AptosBFT v4—a Diem‑derived HotStuff variant—to finalise blocks in less than 1 second. Its Block‑STM executor runs transactions in parallel and abort‑reexecutes on conflict, achieving > 100k TPS in public benchmarks. The 2024 ‘Quorum Store’ upgrade optimised mempool sharding and reduced latency under network partition.
View Full Page
$5.709B
Solana combines Proof‑of‑History, Turbine block propagation and Gulf Stream forwarding to achieve throughput exceeding 50 000 TPS with 400 ms block times. The 2024 Firedancer client written in C++ reduced validator CPU requirements and added parallel pipeline execution. Solana Pay and the Saga phone SDK illustrate the project’s push toward consumer‑grade web3 applications.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Aptos
TVL
$55.44M
24h Volume
$63.33M
24h Fees
$163.2K
24h Revenue
$52.2K
30d Fees
$5.21M
30d Revenue
$1.67M
7d TVL Change
-7.98%
Dominance
0.02%
Solana
TVL
$5.709B
24h Volume
$0
24h Fees
$699.9K
24h Revenue
$109K
30d Fees
$9.71M
30d Revenue
$1.47M
7d TVL Change
+1.54%
Dominance
2.05%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Aptos
1.0%
Solana
99.0%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Aptos
100.0%
Solana
1.0%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Aptos
18.9%
Solana
81.1%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Aptos
32.4%
Solana
67.6%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Aptos
-7.98%
Solana
1.54%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Aptos
0.0%
Solana
2.1%
TVL Comparison
Aptos
Solana