Arbitrum vs Avalanche
Compare Arbitrum and Avalanche on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$1.404B
Arbitrum One and Nova are optimistic rollups using Nitro fraud proofs that compress transactions into calldata submitted to Ethereum. The Orbit toolkit lets projects deploy their own Arbitrum Orbit chains with configurable permissions. ARB token governance manages the 3 000‑plus validator whitelist and a 1 billion‑dollar ecosystem grant fund.
View Full Page$596.45M
Avalanche implements Snowman consensus on its C‑Chain (EVM) and runs a multi‑chain architecture with X‑Chain (UTXO) and P‑Chain (staking). Custom subnets allow projects like DeFi Kingdoms and Intain RWA to spin up their own validator sets with whitelisted tokens. The 2025 Banff hard fork added elastic subnets with dynamic validator staking for improved security sharing.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Arbitrum
TVL$1.404B
24h Volume$271.24M
24h Fees$2.3M
24h Revenue$149.4K
30d Fees$20.08M
30d Revenue$4.29M
7d TVL Change+4.27%
Dominance0.50%
Avalanche
TVL$596.45M
24h Volume$111.99M
24h Fees$304.9K
24h Revenue$100K
30d Fees$11.15M
30d Revenue$4.22M
7d TVL Change+1.87%
Dominance0.21%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Arbitrum
70.2%Avalanche
29.8%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Arbitrum
70.8%Avalanche
29.2%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Arbitrum
88.3%Avalanche
11.7%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Arbitrum
59.9%Avalanche
40.1%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Arbitrum
4.27%Avalanche
1.87%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Arbitrum
0.5%Avalanche
0.2%TVL Comparison
Arbitrum
Avalanche