Arbitrum vs Flare

Compare Arbitrum and Flare on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$1.392B
Arbitrum One and Nova are optimistic rollups using Nitro fraud proofs that compress transactions into calldata submitted to Ethereum. The Orbit toolkit lets projects deploy their own Arbitrum Orbit chains with configurable permissions. ARB token governance manages the 3 000‑plus validator whitelist and a 1 billion‑dollar ecosystem grant fund.
View Full Page
$128.74M
Flare is an EVM-compatible Layer 1 blockchain built to provide decentralized access to high-integrity data from other blockchains and the internet. Through native protocols such as the Flare Data Connector and Flare Time Series Oracle, it enables developers to build data-intensive applications, cross-chain services, and decentralized finance products. Flare’s architecture is designed to enhance interoperability while bringing smart contract functionality to assets and ecosystems beyond Ethereum.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Arbitrum
TVL
$1.392B
24h Volume
$26.02M
24h Fees
$6.2K
24h Revenue
$3.2K
30d Fees
$4.03M
30d Revenue
$1.14M
7d TVL Change
-1.86%
Dominance
0.50%
Flare
TVL
$128.74M
24h Volume
$887
24h Fees
$3
24h Revenue
$0
30d Fees
$967
30d Revenue
$96
7d TVL Change
-4.40%
Dominance
0.05%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Arbitrum
91.5%
Flare
8.5%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Arbitrum
100.0%
Flare
1.0%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Arbitrum
100.0%
Flare
1.0%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Arbitrum
100.0%
Flare
1.0%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Arbitrum
-1.86%
Flare
-4.40%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Arbitrum
0.5%
Flare
0.0%
TVL Comparison
Arbitrum
Flare