Arbitrum vs Hyperliquid L1

Compare Arbitrum and Hyperliquid L1 on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$1.405B
Arbitrum One and Nova are optimistic rollups using Nitro fraud proofs that compress transactions into calldata submitted to Ethereum. The Orbit toolkit lets projects deploy their own Arbitrum Orbit chains with configurable permissions. ARB token governance manages the 3 000‑plus validator whitelist and a 1 billion‑dollar ecosystem grant fund.
View Full Page
$1.022B
Hyperliquid is a performance‑tuned Layer‑1 that employs HyperBFT consensus—an optimised HotStuff variant—to finalise blocks in 400 ms. Its on‑chain order book matches > 100k orders per second without gas, made possible by an in‑memory state machine replicated across 32 validators. Launched in April 2024, the chain settles $4‑6 billion daily volume in perpetual futures and supports CosmWasm smart contracts for third‑party dApps.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Arbitrum
TVL
$1.405B
24h Volume
$148.04M
24h Fees
$387.8K
24h Revenue
$83.9K
30d Fees
$20.09M
30d Revenue
$4.26M
7d TVL Change
+3.01%
Dominance
0.50%
Hyperliquid L1
TVL
$1.022B
24h Volume
$233.7M
24h Fees
$5.45M
24h Revenue
$2.54M
30d Fees
$167.06M
30d Revenue
$75.66M
7d TVL Change
-7.54%
Dominance
0.36%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Arbitrum
57.9%
Hyperliquid L1
42.1%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Arbitrum
38.8%
Hyperliquid L1
61.2%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Arbitrum
6.6%
Hyperliquid L1
93.4%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Arbitrum
3.2%
Hyperliquid L1
96.8%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Arbitrum
3.01%
Hyperliquid L1
-7.54%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Arbitrum
0.5%
Hyperliquid L1
0.4%
TVL Comparison
Arbitrum
Hyperliquid L1