Arbitrum vs Hyperliquid L1

Compare Arbitrum and Hyperliquid L1 on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$1.388B
Arbitrum One and Nova are optimistic rollups using Nitro fraud proofs that compress transactions into calldata submitted to Ethereum. The Orbit toolkit lets projects deploy their own Arbitrum Orbit chains with configurable permissions. ARB token governance manages the 3 000‑plus validator whitelist and a 1 billion‑dollar ecosystem grant fund.
View Full Page
$1.524B
Hyperliquid is a performance‑tuned Layer‑1 that employs HyperBFT consensus—an optimised HotStuff variant—to finalise blocks in 400 ms. Its on‑chain order book matches > 100k orders per second without gas, made possible by an in‑memory state machine replicated across 32 validators. Launched in April 2024, the chain settles $4‑6 billion daily volume in perpetual futures and supports CosmWasm smart contracts for third‑party dApps.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Arbitrum
TVL
$1.388B
24h Volume
$94.33M
24h Fees
$64.8K
24h Revenue
$13.9K
30d Fees
$4.03M
30d Revenue
$1.14M
7d TVL Change
-1.21%
Dominance
0.50%
Hyperliquid L1
TVL
$1.524B
24h Volume
$94.33M
24h Fees
$64.8K
24h Revenue
$13.9K
30d Fees
$4.03M
30d Revenue
$1.14M
7d TVL Change
-2.03%
Dominance
0.55%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Arbitrum
47.7%
Hyperliquid L1
52.3%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Arbitrum
50.0%
Hyperliquid L1
50.0%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Arbitrum
50.0%
Hyperliquid L1
50.0%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Arbitrum
50.0%
Hyperliquid L1
50.0%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Arbitrum
-1.21%
Hyperliquid L1
-2.03%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Arbitrum
0.5%
Hyperliquid L1
0.5%
TVL Comparison
Arbitrum
Hyperliquid L1