Arbitrum vs ICP

Compare Arbitrum and ICP on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$1.368B
Arbitrum One and Nova are optimistic rollups using Nitro fraud proofs that compress transactions into calldata submitted to Ethereum. The Orbit toolkit lets projects deploy their own Arbitrum Orbit chains with configurable permissions. ARB token governance manages the 3 000‑plus validator whitelist and a 1 billion‑dollar ecosystem grant fund.
View Full Page
$13.78M
The Internet Computer (ICP) is a Layer‑1 that runs WebAssembly ‘canisters’ directly on chain, with sub‑second query calls and 2‑second update finality. Boundary nodes translate HTTP requests into signed chain queries, enabling dApps to serve web front‑ends without traditional servers. ICP’s reverse GAS model bills cycles in stable dollar terms, shielding developers from token volatility.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Arbitrum
TVL
$1.368B
24h Volume
$46.37M
24h Fees
$8.7K
24h Revenue
$2.4K
30d Fees
$4.47M
30d Revenue
$950.9K
7d TVL Change
-2.13%
Dominance
0.51%
ICP
TVL
$13.78M
24h Volume
$488.2K
24h Fees
$1.5K
24h Revenue
$304
30d Fees
$41.2K
30d Revenue
$8.2K
7d TVL Change
-9.32%
Dominance
0.01%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Arbitrum
99.0%
ICP
1.0%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Arbitrum
99.0%
ICP
1.0%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Arbitrum
85.1%
ICP
14.9%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Arbitrum
88.9%
ICP
11.1%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Arbitrum
-2.13%
ICP
-9.32%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Arbitrum
0.5%
ICP
0.0%
TVL Comparison
Arbitrum
ICP