Arbitrum vs ICP
Compare Arbitrum and ICP on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$1.368B
Arbitrum One and Nova are optimistic rollups using Nitro fraud proofs that compress transactions into calldata submitted to Ethereum. The Orbit toolkit lets projects deploy their own Arbitrum Orbit chains with configurable permissions. ARB token governance manages the 3 000‑plus validator whitelist and a 1 billion‑dollar ecosystem grant fund.
View Full Page$13.78M
The Internet Computer (ICP) is a Layer‑1 that runs WebAssembly ‘canisters’ directly on chain, with sub‑second query calls and 2‑second update finality. Boundary nodes translate HTTP requests into signed chain queries, enabling dApps to serve web front‑ends without traditional servers. ICP’s reverse GAS model bills cycles in stable dollar terms, shielding developers from token volatility.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Arbitrum
TVL$1.368B
24h Volume$46.37M
24h Fees$8.7K
24h Revenue$2.4K
30d Fees$4.47M
30d Revenue$950.9K
7d TVL Change-2.13%
Dominance0.51%
ICP
TVL$13.78M
24h Volume$488.2K
24h Fees$1.5K
24h Revenue$304
30d Fees$41.2K
30d Revenue$8.2K
7d TVL Change-9.32%
Dominance0.01%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Arbitrum
99.0%ICP
1.0%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Arbitrum
99.0%ICP
1.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Arbitrum
85.1%ICP
14.9%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Arbitrum
88.9%ICP
11.1%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Arbitrum
-2.13%ICP
-9.32%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Arbitrum
0.5%ICP
0.0%TVL Comparison
Arbitrum
ICP