Arbitrum vs Ink
Compare Arbitrum and Ink on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$1.385B
Arbitrum One and Nova are optimistic rollups using Nitro fraud proofs that compress transactions into calldata submitted to Ethereum. The Orbit toolkit lets projects deploy their own Arbitrum Orbit chains with configurable permissions. ARB token governance manages the 3 000‑plus validator whitelist and a 1 billion‑dollar ecosystem grant fund.
View Full Page$151.28M
Ink is Kraken's Ethereum OP Stack Layer-2 built as a DeFi-focused member of the Optimism Superchain. It offers EVM compatibility, low fees and one-second blocks from launch, with sub-second blocks planned, so builders can deploy lending, DEX and yield applications close to Kraken's user base. No dedicated Ink token is mapped yet, so the blockchain is imported without an associated token.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Arbitrum
TVL$1.385B
24h Volume$31.38M
24h Fees$9.8K
24h Revenue$4.9K
30d Fees$4.03M
30d Revenue$1.14M
7d TVL Change-1.86%
Dominance0.50%
Ink
TVL$151.28M
24h Volume$31.38M
24h Fees$9.8K
24h Revenue$4.9K
30d Fees$4.03M
30d Revenue$1.14M
7d TVL Change-2.77%
Dominance0.05%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Arbitrum
90.2%Ink
9.8%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Arbitrum
50.0%Ink
50.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Arbitrum
50.0%Ink
50.0%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Arbitrum
50.0%Ink
50.0%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Arbitrum
-1.86%Ink
-2.77%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Arbitrum
0.5%Ink
0.1%TVL Comparison
Arbitrum
Ink