Arbitrum vs Manta

Compare Arbitrum and Manta on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$1.403B
Arbitrum One and Nova are optimistic rollups using Nitro fraud proofs that compress transactions into calldata submitted to Ethereum. The Orbit toolkit lets projects deploy their own Arbitrum Orbit chains with configurable permissions. ARB token governance manages the 3 000‑plus validator whitelist and a 1 billion‑dollar ecosystem grant fund.
View Full Page
$3.46M
Manta Pacific is a modular zk‑EVM Layer‑2 that stores rollup data on Celestia DA and uses universal circuits to keep prover costs low. Users can deploy privacy‑preserving smart contracts with built‑in zero‑knowledge widgets for shielding balances. The 2025 ‘Marlin’ release adds Account Abstraction and native bridges to Polkadot’s parachain ecosystem.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Arbitrum
TVL
$1.403B
24h Volume
$90.57M
24h Fees
$15K
24h Revenue
$7.3K
30d Fees
$4.27M
30d Revenue
$1.08M
7d TVL Change
+0.68%
Dominance
0.49%
Manta
TVL
$3.46M
24h Volume
$13.87M
24h Fees
$1.9K
24h Revenue
$198
30d Fees
$47K
30d Revenue
$6.5K
7d TVL Change
-0.08%
Dominance
0.00%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Arbitrum
99.8%
Manta
1.0%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Arbitrum
86.7%
Manta
13.3%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Arbitrum
88.7%
Manta
11.3%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Arbitrum
97.4%
Manta
2.6%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Arbitrum
0.68%
Manta
-0.08%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Arbitrum
0.5%
Manta
0.0%
TVL Comparison
Arbitrum
Manta