Arbitrum vs Mantle

Compare Arbitrum and Mantle on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$1.388B
Arbitrum One and Nova are optimistic rollups using Nitro fraud proofs that compress transactions into calldata submitted to Ethereum. The Orbit toolkit lets projects deploy their own Arbitrum Orbit chains with configurable permissions. ARB token governance manages the 3 000‑plus validator whitelist and a 1 billion‑dollar ecosystem grant fund.
View Full Page
$96.91M
Mantle is a modular Ethereum Layer‑2 that decouples execution, data availability and settlement, using Optimistic rollup proofs on Ethereum mainnet and EigenDA for cheap blob‑based data. Its BitDAO‑backed treasury subsidises sequencer fees, keeping swaps under $0.05 even during L1 congestion. The network went live in July 2023 and now hosts over 150 dApps including the Mantle DEX and Fusion perpetuals.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Arbitrum
TVL
$1.388B
24h Volume
$30.63M
24h Fees
$8.3K
24h Revenue
$4.2K
30d Fees
$4.03M
30d Revenue
$1.14M
7d TVL Change
-1.86%
Dominance
0.50%
Mantle
TVL
$96.91M
24h Volume
$30.63M
24h Fees
$8.3K
24h Revenue
$4.2K
30d Fees
$4.03M
30d Revenue
$1.14M
7d TVL Change
+38.80%
Dominance
0.03%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Arbitrum
93.5%
Mantle
6.5%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Arbitrum
50.0%
Mantle
50.0%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Arbitrum
50.0%
Mantle
50.0%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Arbitrum
50.0%
Mantle
50.0%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Arbitrum
-1.86%
Mantle
38.80%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Arbitrum
0.5%
Mantle
0.0%
TVL Comparison
Arbitrum
Mantle