Arbitrum vs Movement

Compare Arbitrum and Movement on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$1.392B
Arbitrum One and Nova are optimistic rollups using Nitro fraud proofs that compress transactions into calldata submitted to Ethereum. The Orbit toolkit lets projects deploy their own Arbitrum Orbit chains with configurable permissions. ARB token governance manages the 3 000‑plus validator whitelist and a 1 billion‑dollar ecosystem grant fund.
View Full Page
$3.04M
Movement is a Move-based blockchain network designed to bring the security and performance of the Move programming language to the Ethereum ecosystem. Built with a modular architecture, it combines MoveVM execution with Ethereum compatibility, enabling developers to build scalable decentralized applications while accessing Ethereum’s liquidity and infrastructure. Movement focuses on high throughput, fast finality, and interoperability between Move and EVM ecosystems.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Arbitrum
TVL
$1.392B
24h Volume
$26.02M
24h Fees
$6.2K
24h Revenue
$3.2K
30d Fees
$4.03M
30d Revenue
$1.14M
7d TVL Change
-1.86%
Dominance
0.50%
Movement
TVL
$3.04M
24h Volume
$957
24h Fees
$1.6K
24h Revenue
$589
30d Fees
$64.7K
30d Revenue
$23.9K
7d TVL Change
-16.82%
Dominance
0.00%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Arbitrum
99.8%
Movement
1.0%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Arbitrum
100.0%
Movement
1.0%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Arbitrum
79.6%
Movement
20.4%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Arbitrum
84.3%
Movement
15.7%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Arbitrum
-1.86%
Movement
-16.82%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Arbitrum
0.5%
Movement
0.0%
TVL Comparison
Arbitrum
Movement