Arbitrum vs Solana

Compare Arbitrum and Solana on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$1.392B
Arbitrum One and Nova are optimistic rollups using Nitro fraud proofs that compress transactions into calldata submitted to Ethereum. The Orbit toolkit lets projects deploy their own Arbitrum Orbit chains with configurable permissions. ARB token governance manages the 3 000‑plus validator whitelist and a 1 billion‑dollar ecosystem grant fund.
View Full Page
$5.709B
Solana combines Proof‑of‑History, Turbine block propagation and Gulf Stream forwarding to achieve throughput exceeding 50 000 TPS with 400 ms block times. The 2024 Firedancer client written in C++ reduced validator CPU requirements and added parallel pipeline execution. Solana Pay and the Saga phone SDK illustrate the project’s push toward consumer‑grade web3 applications.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Arbitrum
TVL
$1.392B
24h Volume
$26.02M
24h Fees
$6.2K
24h Revenue
$3.2K
30d Fees
$4.03M
30d Revenue
$1.14M
7d TVL Change
-1.86%
Dominance
0.50%
Solana
TVL
$5.709B
24h Volume
$0
24h Fees
$699.9K
24h Revenue
$109K
30d Fees
$9.71M
30d Revenue
$1.47M
7d TVL Change
+1.54%
Dominance
2.05%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Arbitrum
19.6%
Solana
80.4%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Arbitrum
100.0%
Solana
1.0%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Arbitrum
1.0%
Solana
99.1%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Arbitrum
2.8%
Solana
97.2%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Arbitrum
-1.86%
Solana
1.54%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Arbitrum
0.5%
Solana
2.1%
TVL Comparison
Arbitrum
Solana