Arbitrum vs Solana
Compare Arbitrum and Solana on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$1.405B
Arbitrum One and Nova are optimistic rollups using Nitro fraud proofs that compress transactions into calldata submitted to Ethereum. The Orbit toolkit lets projects deploy their own Arbitrum Orbit chains with configurable permissions. ARB token governance manages the 3 000‑plus validator whitelist and a 1 billion‑dollar ecosystem grant fund.
View Full Page$5.964B
Solana combines Proof‑of‑History, Turbine block propagation and Gulf Stream forwarding to achieve throughput exceeding 50 000 TPS with 400 ms block times. The 2024 Firedancer client written in C++ reduced validator CPU requirements and added parallel pipeline execution. Solana Pay and the Saga phone SDK illustrate the project’s push toward consumer‑grade web3 applications.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Arbitrum
TVL$1.405B
24h Volume$271.24M
24h Fees$2.3M
24h Revenue$149.4K
30d Fees$20.08M
30d Revenue$4.29M
7d TVL Change+4.27%
Dominance0.49%
Solana
TVL$5.964B
24h Volume$2.539B
24h Fees$12.67M
24h Revenue$5.13M
30d Fees$462.14M
30d Revenue$165.19M
7d TVL Change-2.91%
Dominance2.10%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Arbitrum
19.1%Solana
80.9%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Arbitrum
9.7%Solana
90.3%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Arbitrum
15.4%Solana
84.6%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Arbitrum
2.8%Solana
97.2%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Arbitrum
4.27%Solana
-2.91%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Arbitrum
0.5%Solana
2.1%TVL Comparison
Arbitrum
Solana