Arbitrum vs Stellar

Compare Arbitrum and Stellar on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$1.406B
Arbitrum One and Nova are optimistic rollups using Nitro fraud proofs that compress transactions into calldata submitted to Ethereum. The Orbit toolkit lets projects deploy their own Arbitrum Orbit chains with configurable permissions. ARB token governance manages the 3 000‑plus validator whitelist and a 1 billion‑dollar ecosystem grant fund.
View Full Page
$241.13M
Stellar is a payments‑focused blockchain that uses the Stellar Consensus Protocol (SCP), a federated Byzantine agreement where each node chooses its own quorum slices. Anchors issue fiat‑backed tokens, and Stellar’s built‑in DEX offers path payments that can hop through multiple assets in a single transaction. The 2023 Soroban upgrade added WebAssembly smart contracts, enabling on‑chain AMMs, lending and other DeFi primitives.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Arbitrum
TVL
$1.406B
24h Volume
$271.24M
24h Fees
$2.3M
24h Revenue
$149.4K
30d Fees
$20.08M
30d Revenue
$4.29M
7d TVL Change
+4.27%
Dominance
0.50%
Stellar
TVL
$241.13M
24h Volume
$3.59M
24h Fees
$2.07M
24h Revenue
$16.6K
30d Fees
$7.25M
30d Revenue
$473.5K
7d TVL Change
-2.84%
Dominance
0.08%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Arbitrum
85.4%
Stellar
14.6%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Arbitrum
98.7%
Stellar
1.3%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Arbitrum
52.6%
Stellar
47.4%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Arbitrum
90.0%
Stellar
10.0%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Arbitrum
4.27%
Stellar
-2.84%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Arbitrum
0.5%
Stellar
0.1%
TVL Comparison
Arbitrum
Stellar