Arbitrum vs TON
Compare Arbitrum and TON on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$1.403B
Arbitrum One and Nova are optimistic rollups using Nitro fraud proofs that compress transactions into calldata submitted to Ethereum. The Orbit toolkit lets projects deploy their own Arbitrum Orbit chains with configurable permissions. ARB token governance manages the 3 000‑plus validator whitelist and a 1 billion‑dollar ecosystem grant fund.
View Full Page$51.18M
The Open Network (TON) is a sharded Layer‑1 originally designed by Telegram, featuring dynamic workchains and instant cross‑shard consensus through the Vertical Blockchain mechanism. The TON Storage and TON DNS services extend functionality beyond payments, whereas the Tap‑to‑Transfer feature has onboarded millions of Telegram users. A 2025 governance vote approved jetton fee burns to make TON mildly deflationary.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Arbitrum
TVL$1.403B
24h Volume$19.05M
24h Fees$3.4K
24h Revenue$1.8K
30d Fees$4.27M
30d Revenue$1.24M
7d TVL Change-0.30%
Dominance0.49%
TON
TVL$51.18M
24h Volume$3.09M
24h Fees$11.1K
24h Revenue$2.5K
30d Fees$306.7K
30d Revenue$69.3K
7d TVL Change+0.59%
Dominance0.02%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Arbitrum
96.5%TON
3.5%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Arbitrum
86.0%TON
14.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Arbitrum
23.4%TON
76.6%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Arbitrum
41.9%TON
58.1%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Arbitrum
-0.30%TON
0.59%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Arbitrum
0.5%TON
0.0%TVL Comparison
Arbitrum
TON