Arbitrum vs TON
Compare Arbitrum and TON on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$1.388B
Arbitrum One and Nova are optimistic rollups using Nitro fraud proofs that compress transactions into calldata submitted to Ethereum. The Orbit toolkit lets projects deploy their own Arbitrum Orbit chains with configurable permissions. ARB token governance manages the 3 000‑plus validator whitelist and a 1 billion‑dollar ecosystem grant fund.
View Full Page$48.98M
The Open Network (TON) is a sharded Layer‑1 originally designed by Telegram, featuring dynamic workchains and instant cross‑shard consensus through the Vertical Blockchain mechanism. The TON Storage and TON DNS services extend functionality beyond payments, whereas the Tap‑to‑Transfer feature has onboarded millions of Telegram users. A 2025 governance vote approved jetton fee burns to make TON mildly deflationary.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Arbitrum
TVL$1.388B
24h Volume$94.33M
24h Fees$64.8K
24h Revenue$13.9K
30d Fees$4.03M
30d Revenue$1.14M
7d TVL Change-1.21%
Dominance0.50%
TON
TVL$48.98M
24h Volume$3.28M
24h Fees$11.2K
24h Revenue$2.5K
30d Fees$316.5K
30d Revenue$72.4K
7d TVL Change-5.66%
Dominance0.02%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Arbitrum
96.6%TON
3.4%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Arbitrum
96.6%TON
3.4%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Arbitrum
85.3%TON
14.7%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Arbitrum
84.8%TON
15.2%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Arbitrum
-1.21%TON
-5.66%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Arbitrum
0.5%TON
0.0%TVL Comparison
Arbitrum
TON