Arbitrum vs Vaulta

Compare Arbitrum and Vaulta on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$1.392B
Arbitrum One and Nova are optimistic rollups using Nitro fraud proofs that compress transactions into calldata submitted to Ethereum. The Orbit toolkit lets projects deploy their own Arbitrum Orbit chains with configurable permissions. ARB token governance manages the 3 000‑plus validator whitelist and a 1 billion‑dollar ecosystem grant fund.
View Full Page
$36.09M
Vaulta is a Layer-1 chain built as the operating system for Web3 banking. It combines a high-performance, deterministic-finality blockchain with modules for wealth management, consumer payments, portfolio investment, and crypto-native insurance. Fully EVM-compatible, Vaulta supports Bitcoin integration via ExSat, cross-chain transfers through IBC, and a staking-backed stable financial infrastructure for institutions and individuals.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Arbitrum
TVL
$1.392B
24h Volume
$26.02M
24h Fees
$6.2K
24h Revenue
$3.2K
30d Fees
$4.03M
30d Revenue
$1.14M
7d TVL Change
-1.86%
Dominance
0.50%
Vaulta
TVL
$36.09M
24h Volume
$9.7K
24h Fees
$17.9K
24h Revenue
$3.6K
30d Fees
$394.9K
30d Revenue
$79K
7d TVL Change
+2.23%
Dominance
0.01%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Arbitrum
97.5%
Vaulta
2.5%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Arbitrum
100.0%
Vaulta
1.0%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Arbitrum
25.7%
Vaulta
74.3%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Arbitrum
46.9%
Vaulta
53.1%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Arbitrum
-1.86%
Vaulta
2.23%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Arbitrum
0.5%
Vaulta
0.0%
TVL Comparison
Arbitrum
Vaulta