Avalanche vs Hedera

Compare Avalanche and Hedera on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$472.25M
Avalanche implements Snowman consensus on its C‑Chain (EVM) and runs a multi‑chain architecture with X‑Chain (UTXO) and P‑Chain (staking). Custom subnets allow projects like DeFi Kingdoms and Intain RWA to spin up their own validator sets with whitelisted tokens. The 2025 Banff hard fork added elastic subnets with dynamic validator staking for improved security sharing.
View Full Page
$25.92M
Hedera Hashgraph uses a gossip‑about‑gossip DAG protocol that achieves asynchronous Byzantine fault tolerance and finality in 3‑5 seconds. Governing Council members like Google and IBM run permissioned nodes, and the Hedera Token Service allows issuance without smart‑contract coding. The 2024 ‘Smart Contract 2.0’ release introduced Solidity bytecode support via Hyperledger Besu integration.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Avalanche
TVL
$472.25M
24h Volume
$30.63M
24h Fees
$8.3K
24h Revenue
$4.2K
30d Fees
$4.03M
30d Revenue
$1.14M
7d TVL Change
-0.89%
Dominance
0.17%
Hedera
TVL
$25.92M
24h Volume
$76.9K
24h Fees
$18.2K
24h Revenue
$1.1K
30d Fees
$373K
30d Revenue
$22K
7d TVL Change
+12.17%
Dominance
0.01%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Avalanche
94.8%
Hedera
5.2%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Avalanche
99.7%
Hedera
1.0%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Avalanche
31.4%
Hedera
68.6%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Avalanche
79.4%
Hedera
20.6%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Avalanche
-0.89%
Hedera
12.17%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Avalanche
0.2%
Hedera
0.0%
TVL Comparison
Avalanche
Hedera