Avalanche vs Manta
Compare Avalanche and Manta on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$472.25M
Avalanche implements Snowman consensus on its C‑Chain (EVM) and runs a multi‑chain architecture with X‑Chain (UTXO) and P‑Chain (staking). Custom subnets allow projects like DeFi Kingdoms and Intain RWA to spin up their own validator sets with whitelisted tokens. The 2025 Banff hard fork added elastic subnets with dynamic validator staking for improved security sharing.
View Full Page$3.46M
Manta Pacific is a modular zk‑EVM Layer‑2 that stores rollup data on Celestia DA and uses universal circuits to keep prover costs low. Users can deploy privacy‑preserving smart contracts with built‑in zero‑knowledge widgets for shielding balances. The 2025 ‘Marlin’ release adds Account Abstraction and native bridges to Polkadot’s parachain ecosystem.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Avalanche
TVL$472.25M
24h Volume$30.63M
24h Fees$8.3K
24h Revenue$4.2K
30d Fees$4.03M
30d Revenue$1.14M
7d TVL Change-0.89%
Dominance0.17%
Manta
TVL$3.46M
24h Volume$9.94M
24h Fees$3.8K
24h Revenue$1.1K
30d Fees$41.8K
30d Revenue$6.2K
7d TVL Change-6.11%
Dominance0.00%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Avalanche
99.3%Manta
1.0%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Avalanche
75.5%Manta
24.5%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Avalanche
68.9%Manta
31.1%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Avalanche
79.4%Manta
20.6%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Avalanche
-0.89%Manta
-6.11%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Avalanche
0.2%Manta
0.0%TVL Comparison
Avalanche
Manta