Avalanche vs PulseChain
Compare Avalanche and PulseChain on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$598.86M
Avalanche implements Snowman consensus on its C‑Chain (EVM) and runs a multi‑chain architecture with X‑Chain (UTXO) and P‑Chain (staking). Custom subnets allow projects like DeFi Kingdoms and Intain RWA to spin up their own validator sets with whitelisted tokens. The 2025 Banff hard fork added elastic subnets with dynamic validator staking for improved security sharing.
View Full Page$50.51M
Key Metrics Comparison
Avalanche
TVL$598.86M
24h Volume$108.17M
24h Fees$272.8K
24h Revenue$97.4K
30d Fees$11.12M
30d Revenue$4.12M
7d TVL Change-3.39%
Dominance0.65%
PulseChain
TVL$50.51M
24h Volume$4.07M
24h Fees$14.7K
24h Revenue$10.7K
30d Fees$594.2K
30d Revenue$405.7K
7d TVL Change-36.97%
Dominance0.05%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Avalanche
92.2%PulseChain
7.8%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Avalanche
96.4%PulseChain
3.6%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Avalanche
94.9%PulseChain
5.1%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Avalanche
90.1%PulseChain
9.9%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Avalanche
-3.39%PulseChain
-36.97%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Avalanche
0.6%PulseChain
0.1%TVL Comparison
Avalanche
PulseChain