Avalanche vs TON
Compare Avalanche and TON on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$593.61M
Avalanche implements Snowman consensus on its C‑Chain (EVM) and runs a multi‑chain architecture with X‑Chain (UTXO) and P‑Chain (staking). Custom subnets allow projects like DeFi Kingdoms and Intain RWA to spin up their own validator sets with whitelisted tokens. The 2025 Banff hard fork added elastic subnets with dynamic validator staking for improved security sharing.
View Full Page$49.08M
The Open Network (TON) is a sharded Layer‑1 originally designed by Telegram, featuring dynamic workchains and instant cross‑shard consensus through the Vertical Blockchain mechanism. The TON Storage and TON DNS services extend functionality beyond payments, whereas the Tap‑to‑Transfer feature has onboarded millions of Telegram users. A 2025 governance vote approved jetton fee burns to make TON mildly deflationary.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Avalanche
TVL$593.61M
24h Volume$132.44M
24h Fees$343.7K
24h Revenue$115.1K
30d Fees$11.21M
30d Revenue$4.23M
7d TVL Change-3.06%
Dominance0.21%
TON
TVL$49.08M
24h Volume$2.9M
24h Fees$1.25M
24h Revenue$51.6K
30d Fees$35.03M
30d Revenue$1.24M
7d TVL Change-6.28%
Dominance0.02%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Avalanche
92.4%TON
7.6%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Avalanche
97.9%TON
2.1%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Avalanche
21.6%TON
78.4%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Avalanche
69.0%TON
31.0%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Avalanche
-3.06%TON
-6.28%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Avalanche
0.2%TON
0.0%TVL Comparison
Avalanche
TON