Flow vs Injective
Compare Flow and Injective on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$12.12M
Flow features a multi‑role architecture—collection, consensus, execution and verification nodes—that splits tasks for high throughput while keeping deterministic execution. Cadence, its resource‑oriented language, powers popular NFT projects like NBA Top Shot and Gaia marketplace. The 2024 ‘Spork’ upgrade introduced FCL walletless onboarding and bridged USDC from Ethereum to boost DeFi liquidity.
View Full Page$9.23M
Injective is a Cosmos‑SDK Layer‑1 with on‑chain order books, zero‑gas trading and a frequent batch auction that mitigates MEV. Its built‑in Ethereum bridge lets users bring ERC‑20s without custodial risk, and the WasmX module supports CosmWasm smart contracts. INJ holders can stake or participate in governance that controls upgrades like the 2024 Volan hard fork which added liquid staking.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Flow
TVL$12.12M
24h Volume$5.5K
24h Fees$1.3K
24h Revenue$141
30d Fees$79.2K
30d Revenue$7.8K
7d TVL Change+2.06%
Dominance0.00%
Injective
TVL$9.23M
24h Volume$56.3K
24h Fees$21.3K
24h Revenue$21.3K
30d Fees$487.4K
30d Revenue$487.4K
7d TVL Change-15.17%
Dominance0.00%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Flow
56.8%Injective
43.2%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Flow
9.0%Injective
91.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Flow
5.8%Injective
94.2%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Flow
1.0%Injective
99.3%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Flow
2.06%Injective
-15.17%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Flow
0.0%Injective
0.0%TVL Comparison
Flow
Injective