Flow vs Ink
Compare Flow and Ink on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$10.51M
Flow features a multi‑role architecture—collection, consensus, execution and verification nodes—that splits tasks for high throughput while keeping deterministic execution. Cadence, its resource‑oriented language, powers popular NFT projects like NBA Top Shot and Gaia marketplace. The 2024 ‘Spork’ upgrade introduced FCL walletless onboarding and bridged USDC from Ethereum to boost DeFi liquidity.
View Full Page$203.05M
Ink is Kraken's Ethereum OP Stack Layer-2 built as a DeFi-focused member of the Optimism Superchain. It offers EVM compatibility, low fees and one-second blocks from launch, with sub-second blocks planned, so builders can deploy lending, DEX and yield applications close to Kraken's user base. No dedicated Ink token is mapped yet, so the blockchain is imported without an associated token.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Flow
TVL$10.51M
24h Volume$544K
24h Fees$11.3K
24h Revenue$988
30d Fees$102.9K
30d Revenue$6.1K
7d TVL Change-5.92%
Dominance0.00%
Ink
TVL$203.05M
24h Volume$4.85M
24h Fees$220.5K
24h Revenue$67.5K
30d Fees$4.75M
30d Revenue$1.3M
7d TVL Change-0.70%
Dominance0.07%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Flow
4.9%Ink
95.1%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Flow
10.1%Ink
89.9%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Flow
4.9%Ink
95.1%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Flow
1.4%Ink
98.6%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Flow
-5.92%Ink
-0.70%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Flow
0.0%Ink
0.1%TVL Comparison
Flow
Ink