Flow vs Manta

Compare Flow and Manta on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$12.16M
Flow features a multi‑role architecture—collection, consensus, execution and verification nodes—that splits tasks for high throughput while keeping deterministic execution. Cadence, its resource‑oriented language, powers popular NFT projects like NBA Top Shot and Gaia marketplace. The 2024 ‘Spork’ upgrade introduced FCL walletless onboarding and bridged USDC from Ethereum to boost DeFi liquidity.
View Full Page
$3.46M
Manta Pacific is a modular zk‑EVM Layer‑2 that stores rollup data on Celestia DA and uses universal circuits to keep prover costs low. Users can deploy privacy‑preserving smart contracts with built‑in zero‑knowledge widgets for shielding balances. The 2025 ‘Marlin’ release adds Account Abstraction and native bridges to Polkadot’s parachain ecosystem.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Flow
TVL
$12.16M
24h Volume
$5.5K
24h Fees
$1.3K
24h Revenue
$131
30d Fees
$79.2K
30d Revenue
$7.9K
7d TVL Change
+1.75%
Dominance
0.00%
Manta
TVL
$3.46M
24h Volume
$9.94M
24h Fees
$3.8K
24h Revenue
$1.1K
30d Fees
$41.8K
30d Revenue
$6.2K
7d TVL Change
-6.11%
Dominance
0.00%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Flow
77.9%
Manta
22.1%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Flow
1.0%
Manta
99.9%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Flow
25.9%
Manta
74.1%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Flow
10.7%
Manta
89.3%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Flow
1.75%
Manta
-6.11%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Flow
0.0%
Manta
0.0%
TVL Comparison
Flow
Manta