Flow vs Movement

Compare Flow and Movement on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$12.15M
Flow features a multi‑role architecture—collection, consensus, execution and verification nodes—that splits tasks for high throughput while keeping deterministic execution. Cadence, its resource‑oriented language, powers popular NFT projects like NBA Top Shot and Gaia marketplace. The 2024 ‘Spork’ upgrade introduced FCL walletless onboarding and bridged USDC from Ethereum to boost DeFi liquidity.
View Full Page
$3.04M
Movement is a Move-based blockchain network designed to bring the security and performance of the Move programming language to the Ethereum ecosystem. Built with a modular architecture, it combines MoveVM execution with Ethereum compatibility, enabling developers to build scalable decentralized applications while accessing Ethereum’s liquidity and infrastructure. Movement focuses on high throughput, fast finality, and interoperability between Move and EVM ecosystems.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Flow
TVL
$12.15M
24h Volume
$5.5K
24h Fees
$1.3K
24h Revenue
$131
30d Fees
$79.2K
30d Revenue
$7.9K
7d TVL Change
+1.75%
Dominance
0.00%
Movement
TVL
$3.04M
24h Volume
$1.1K
24h Fees
$1.6K
24h Revenue
$589
30d Fees
$64.7K
30d Revenue
$23.9K
7d TVL Change
-16.99%
Dominance
0.00%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Flow
80.0%
Movement
20.0%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Flow
83.4%
Movement
16.6%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Flow
45.3%
Movement
54.7%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Flow
18.2%
Movement
81.8%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Flow
1.75%
Movement
-16.99%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Flow
0.0%
Movement
0.0%
TVL Comparison
Flow
Movement