Flow vs Movement
Compare Flow and Movement on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$12.15M
Flow features a multi‑role architecture—collection, consensus, execution and verification nodes—that splits tasks for high throughput while keeping deterministic execution. Cadence, its resource‑oriented language, powers popular NFT projects like NBA Top Shot and Gaia marketplace. The 2024 ‘Spork’ upgrade introduced FCL walletless onboarding and bridged USDC from Ethereum to boost DeFi liquidity.
View Full Page$3.04M
Movement is a Move-based blockchain network designed to bring the security and performance of the Move programming language to the Ethereum ecosystem. Built with a modular architecture, it combines MoveVM execution with Ethereum compatibility, enabling developers to build scalable decentralized applications while accessing Ethereum’s liquidity and infrastructure. Movement focuses on high throughput, fast finality, and interoperability between Move and EVM ecosystems.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Flow
TVL$12.15M
24h Volume$5.5K
24h Fees$1.3K
24h Revenue$131
30d Fees$79.2K
30d Revenue$7.9K
7d TVL Change+1.75%
Dominance0.00%
Movement
TVL$3.04M
24h Volume$1.1K
24h Fees$1.6K
24h Revenue$589
30d Fees$64.7K
30d Revenue$23.9K
7d TVL Change-16.99%
Dominance0.00%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Flow
80.0%Movement
20.0%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Flow
83.4%Movement
16.6%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Flow
45.3%Movement
54.7%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Flow
18.2%Movement
81.8%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Flow
1.75%Movement
-16.99%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Flow
0.0%Movement
0.0%TVL Comparison
Flow
Movement