Flow vs TON
Compare Flow and TON on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$10.5M
Flow features a multi‑role architecture—collection, consensus, execution and verification nodes—that splits tasks for high throughput while keeping deterministic execution. Cadence, its resource‑oriented language, powers popular NFT projects like NBA Top Shot and Gaia marketplace. The 2024 ‘Spork’ upgrade introduced FCL walletless onboarding and bridged USDC from Ethereum to boost DeFi liquidity.
View Full Page$48.94M
The Open Network (TON) is a sharded Layer‑1 originally designed by Telegram, featuring dynamic workchains and instant cross‑shard consensus through the Vertical Blockchain mechanism. The TON Storage and TON DNS services extend functionality beyond payments, whereas the Tap‑to‑Transfer feature has onboarded millions of Telegram users. A 2025 governance vote approved jetton fee burns to make TON mildly deflationary.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Flow
TVL$10.5M
24h Volume$544K
24h Fees$11.3K
24h Revenue$988
30d Fees$102.9K
30d Revenue$6.1K
7d TVL Change-5.92%
Dominance0.00%
TON
TVL$48.94M
24h Volume$3.43M
24h Fees$1.32M
24h Revenue$156.5K
30d Fees$35.05M
30d Revenue$1.29M
7d TVL Change-1.47%
Dominance0.02%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Flow
17.7%TON
82.3%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Flow
13.7%TON
86.3%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Flow
1.0%TON
99.1%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Flow
1.0%TON
99.4%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Flow
-5.92%TON
-1.47%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Flow
0.0%TON
0.0%TVL Comparison
Flow
TON