Flow vs TON

Compare Flow and TON on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$12.1M
Flow features a multi‑role architecture—collection, consensus, execution and verification nodes—that splits tasks for high throughput while keeping deterministic execution. Cadence, its resource‑oriented language, powers popular NFT projects like NBA Top Shot and Gaia marketplace. The 2024 ‘Spork’ upgrade introduced FCL walletless onboarding and bridged USDC from Ethereum to boost DeFi liquidity.
View Full Page
$54.18M
The Open Network (TON) is a sharded Layer‑1 originally designed by Telegram, featuring dynamic workchains and instant cross‑shard consensus through the Vertical Blockchain mechanism. The TON Storage and TON DNS services extend functionality beyond payments, whereas the Tap‑to‑Transfer feature has onboarded millions of Telegram users. A 2025 governance vote approved jetton fee burns to make TON mildly deflationary.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Flow
TVL
$12.1M
24h Volume
$6.2K
24h Fees
$4.8K
24h Revenue
$475
30d Fees
$50.2K
30d Revenue
$5K
7d TVL Change
-3.52%
Dominance
0.00%
TON
TVL
$54.18M
24h Volume
$1.76M
24h Fees
$6.8K
24h Revenue
$1.3K
30d Fees
$296.5K
30d Revenue
$65.6K
7d TVL Change
+7.38%
Dominance
0.02%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Flow
18.3%
TON
81.7%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Flow
1.0%
TON
99.6%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Flow
41.0%
TON
59.0%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Flow
26.4%
TON
73.6%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Flow
-3.52%
TON
7.38%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Flow
0.0%
TON
0.0%
TVL Comparison
Flow
TON