Hedera vs Injective
Compare Hedera and Injective on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$33.14M
Hedera Hashgraph uses a gossip‑about‑gossip DAG protocol that achieves asynchronous Byzantine fault tolerance and finality in 3‑5 seconds. Governing Council members like Google and IBM run permissioned nodes, and the Hedera Token Service allows issuance without smart‑contract coding. The 2024 ‘Smart Contract 2.0’ release introduced Solidity bytecode support via Hyperledger Besu integration.
View Full Page$14.78M
Injective is a Cosmos‑SDK Layer‑1 with on‑chain order books, zero‑gas trading and a frequent batch auction that mitigates MEV. Its built‑in Ethereum bridge lets users bring ERC‑20s without custodial risk, and the WasmX module supports CosmWasm smart contracts. INJ holders can stake or participate in governance that controls upgrades like the 2024 Volan hard fork which added liquid staking.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Hedera
TVL$33.14M
24h Volume$1.74M
24h Fees$5K
24h Revenue$710
30d Fees$262.2K
30d Revenue$39.6K
7d TVL Change-4.88%
Dominance0.01%
Injective
TVL$14.78M
24h Volume$5.25M
24h Fees$775
24h Revenue$232
30d Fees$34.5K
30d Revenue$9K
7d TVL Change+30.16%
Dominance0.01%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Hedera
69.2%Injective
30.8%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Hedera
24.9%Injective
75.1%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Hedera
86.6%Injective
13.4%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Hedera
75.4%Injective
24.6%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Hedera
-4.88%Injective
30.16%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Hedera
0.0%Injective
0.0%TVL Comparison
Hedera
Injective