ICP vs Movement

Compare ICP and Movement on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$14.48M
The Internet Computer (ICP) is a Layer‑1 that runs WebAssembly ‘canisters’ directly on chain, with sub‑second query calls and 2‑second update finality. Boundary nodes translate HTTP requests into signed chain queries, enabling dApps to serve web front‑ends without traditional servers. ICP’s reverse GAS model bills cycles in stable dollar terms, shielding developers from token volatility.
View Full Page
$3.04M
Movement is a Move-based blockchain network designed to bring the security and performance of the Move programming language to the Ethereum ecosystem. Built with a modular architecture, it combines MoveVM execution with Ethereum compatibility, enabling developers to build scalable decentralized applications while accessing Ethereum’s liquidity and infrastructure. Movement focuses on high throughput, fast finality, and interoperability between Move and EVM ecosystems.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

ICP
TVL
$14.48M
24h Volume
$426.3K
24h Fees
$1.3K
24h Revenue
$256
30d Fees
$24.8K
30d Revenue
$5K
7d TVL Change
+2.07%
Dominance
0.01%
Movement
TVL
$3.04M
24h Volume
$1.2K
24h Fees
$1.6K
24h Revenue
$589
30d Fees
$64.7K
30d Revenue
$23.9K
7d TVL Change
-16.82%
Dominance
0.00%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
ICP
82.6%
Movement
17.4%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
ICP
99.7%
Movement
1.0%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
ICP
44.6%
Movement
55.4%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
ICP
30.3%
Movement
69.7%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
ICP
2.07%
Movement
-16.82%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
ICP
0.0%
Movement
0.0%
TVL Comparison
ICP
Movement