Injective vs Ink

Compare Injective and Ink on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$9.23M
Injective is a Cosmos‑SDK Layer‑1 with on‑chain order books, zero‑gas trading and a frequent batch auction that mitigates MEV. Its built‑in Ethereum bridge lets users bring ERC‑20s without custodial risk, and the WasmX module supports CosmWasm smart contracts. INJ holders can stake or participate in governance that controls upgrades like the 2024 Volan hard fork which added liquid staking.
View Full Page
$151.21M
Ink is Kraken's Ethereum OP Stack Layer-2 built as a DeFi-focused member of the Optimism Superchain. It offers EVM compatibility, low fees and one-second blocks from launch, with sub-second blocks planned, so builders can deploy lending, DEX and yield applications close to Kraken's user base. No dedicated Ink token is mapped yet, so the blockchain is imported without an associated token.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Injective
TVL
$9.23M
24h Volume
$56.3K
24h Fees
$21.3K
24h Revenue
$21.3K
30d Fees
$487.4K
30d Revenue
$487.4K
7d TVL Change
-15.17%
Dominance
0.00%
Ink
TVL
$151.21M
24h Volume
$94.33M
24h Fees
$64.8K
24h Revenue
$13.9K
30d Fees
$4.03M
30d Revenue
$1.14M
7d TVL Change
+4.35%
Dominance
0.05%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Injective
5.8%
Ink
94.2%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Injective
1.0%
Ink
99.9%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Injective
24.8%
Ink
75.2%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Injective
60.6%
Ink
39.4%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Injective
-15.17%
Ink
4.35%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Injective
0.0%
Ink
0.1%
TVL Comparison
Injective
Ink