Injective vs Manta
Compare Injective and Manta on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$9.21M
Injective is a Cosmos‑SDK Layer‑1 with on‑chain order books, zero‑gas trading and a frequent batch auction that mitigates MEV. Its built‑in Ethereum bridge lets users bring ERC‑20s without custodial risk, and the WasmX module supports CosmWasm smart contracts. INJ holders can stake or participate in governance that controls upgrades like the 2024 Volan hard fork which added liquid staking.
View Full Page$3.45M
Manta Pacific is a modular zk‑EVM Layer‑2 that stores rollup data on Celestia DA and uses universal circuits to keep prover costs low. Users can deploy privacy‑preserving smart contracts with built‑in zero‑knowledge widgets for shielding balances. The 2025 ‘Marlin’ release adds Account Abstraction and native bridges to Polkadot’s parachain ecosystem.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Injective
TVL$9.21M
24h Volume$56.3K
24h Fees$21.3K
24h Revenue$21.3K
30d Fees$487.4K
30d Revenue$487.4K
7d TVL Change-15.17%
Dominance0.00%
Manta
TVL$3.45M
24h Volume$9.94M
24h Fees$3.8K
24h Revenue$1.1K
30d Fees$41.8K
30d Revenue$6.2K
7d TVL Change-4.94%
Dominance0.00%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Injective
72.7%Manta
27.3%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Injective
1.0%Manta
99.4%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Injective
85.0%Manta
15.0%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Injective
95.1%Manta
4.9%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Injective
-15.17%Manta
-4.94%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Injective
0.0%Manta
0.0%TVL Comparison
Injective
Manta