Injective vs Mantle
Compare Injective and Mantle on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$9.19M
Injective is a Cosmos‑SDK Layer‑1 with on‑chain order books, zero‑gas trading and a frequent batch auction that mitigates MEV. Its built‑in Ethereum bridge lets users bring ERC‑20s without custodial risk, and the WasmX module supports CosmWasm smart contracts. INJ holders can stake or participate in governance that controls upgrades like the 2024 Volan hard fork which added liquid staking.
View Full Page$96.64M
Mantle is a modular Ethereum Layer‑2 that decouples execution, data availability and settlement, using Optimistic rollup proofs on Ethereum mainnet and EigenDA for cheap blob‑based data. Its BitDAO‑backed treasury subsidises sequencer fees, keeping swaps under $0.05 even during L1 congestion. The network went live in July 2023 and now hosts over 150 dApps including the Mantle DEX and Fusion perpetuals.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Injective
TVL$9.19M
24h Volume$56.3K
24h Fees$21.3K
24h Revenue$21.3K
30d Fees$487.4K
30d Revenue$487.4K
7d TVL Change-15.17%
Dominance0.00%
Mantle
TVL$96.64M
24h Volume$26.02M
24h Fees$6.2K
24h Revenue$3.2K
30d Fees$4.03M
30d Revenue$1.14M
7d TVL Change+38.80%
Dominance0.03%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Injective
8.7%Mantle
91.3%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Injective
1.0%Mantle
99.8%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Injective
77.4%Mantle
22.6%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Injective
87.1%Mantle
12.9%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Injective
-15.17%Mantle
38.80%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Injective
0.0%Mantle
0.0%TVL Comparison
Injective
Mantle