Injective vs OP Mainnet

Compare Injective and OP Mainnet on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$14.57M
Injective is a Cosmos‑SDK Layer‑1 with on‑chain order books, zero‑gas trading and a frequent batch auction that mitigates MEV. Its built‑in Ethereum bridge lets users bring ERC‑20s without custodial risk, and the WasmX module supports CosmWasm smart contracts. INJ holders can stake or participate in governance that controls upgrades like the 2024 Volan hard fork which added liquid staking.
View Full Page
$444.03M
OP Mainnet (Optimism) is an optimistic rollup that batches transactions to Ethereum and relies on fraud proofs submitted during a seven‑day challenge window. The Bedrock upgrade in 2023 cut L1 calldata costs by 40 % and introduced multi‑proof modularity. ‘RetroPGF’ rounds redistribute protocol revenue to public‑goods builders, governed by the OP token‑holder Collective.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Injective
TVL
$14.57M
24h Volume
$5.03M
24h Fees
$488
24h Revenue
$151
30d Fees
$33.7K
30d Revenue
$8.7K
7d TVL Change
+20.34%
Dominance
0.01%
OP Mainnet
TVL
$444.03M
24h Volume
$31.19M
24h Fees
$124.4K
24h Revenue
$118.5K
30d Fees
$6.3M
30d Revenue
$3.77M
7d TVL Change
-0.63%
Dominance
0.16%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Injective
3.2%
OP Mainnet
96.8%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Injective
13.9%
OP Mainnet
86.1%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Injective
1.0%
OP Mainnet
99.6%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Injective
1.0%
OP Mainnet
99.9%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Injective
20.34%
OP Mainnet
-0.63%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Injective
0.0%
OP Mainnet
0.2%
TVL Comparison
Injective
OP Mainnet