Injective vs Ronin
Compare Injective and Ronin on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$14.63M
Injective is a Cosmos‑SDK Layer‑1 with on‑chain order books, zero‑gas trading and a frequent batch auction that mitigates MEV. Its built‑in Ethereum bridge lets users bring ERC‑20s without custodial risk, and the WasmX module supports CosmWasm smart contracts. INJ holders can stake or participate in governance that controls upgrades like the 2024 Volan hard fork which added liquid staking.
View Full Page$11.16M
Ronin is a delegated proof‑of‑authority sidechain built for gaming, best known for powering Axie Infinity. After the 2022 bridge exploit, Ronin migrated to a 17‑validator set with hardware‑signing requirements and added zkSync‑powered zkRonin bridges for withdrawals. The chain supports ERC‑721 and ERC‑1155 NFTs and charges near‑zero fees denominated in RON.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Injective
TVL$14.63M
24h Volume$5.03M
24h Fees$488
24h Revenue$151
30d Fees$33.7K
30d Revenue$8.7K
7d TVL Change+20.34%
Dominance0.01%
Ronin
TVL$11.16M
24h Volume$320.4K
24h Fees$5.3K
24h Revenue$4.3K
30d Fees$205.1K
30d Revenue$145.4K
7d TVL Change-5.07%
Dominance0.00%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Injective
56.7%Ronin
43.3%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Injective
94.0%Ronin
6.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Injective
8.5%Ronin
91.5%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Injective
3.4%Ronin
96.6%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Injective
20.34%Ronin
-5.07%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Injective
0.0%Ronin
0.0%TVL Comparison
Injective
Ronin