Injective vs Sei

Compare Injective and Sei on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$9.21M
Injective is a Cosmos‑SDK Layer‑1 with on‑chain order books, zero‑gas trading and a frequent batch auction that mitigates MEV. Its built‑in Ethereum bridge lets users bring ERC‑20s without custodial risk, and the WasmX module supports CosmWasm smart contracts. INJ holders can stake or participate in governance that controls upgrades like the 2024 Volan hard fork which added liquid staking.
View Full Page
$32.1M
Sei is a parallelised Cosmos‑SDK Layer‑1 optimized for order‑book exchanges, using Twin‑Turbo consensus to reach 300–400 ms finality. Its built‑in matching engine lets dApps compose on a shared liquidity layer, and fee markets are denominated in SEI with bulk‑order discounts. The ‘V2’ upgrade adds EVM compatibility via SeiDB and WASM contracts side‑by‑side.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Injective
TVL
$9.21M
24h Volume
$56.3K
24h Fees
$21.3K
24h Revenue
$21.3K
30d Fees
$487.4K
30d Revenue
$487.4K
7d TVL Change
-15.17%
Dominance
0.00%
Sei
TVL
$32.1M
24h Volume
$1.22B
24h Fees
$3.8K
24h Revenue
$1.1K
30d Fees
$41.8K
30d Revenue
$6.2K
7d TVL Change
-2.07%
Dominance
0.01%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Injective
22.3%
Sei
77.7%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Injective
1.0%
Sei
100.0%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Injective
85.0%
Sei
15.0%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Injective
95.1%
Sei
4.9%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Injective
-15.17%
Sei
-2.07%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Injective
0.0%
Sei
0.0%
TVL Comparison
Injective
Sei