Injective vs Stacks
Compare Injective and Stacks on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$9.23M
Injective is a Cosmos‑SDK Layer‑1 with on‑chain order books, zero‑gas trading and a frequent batch auction that mitigates MEV. Its built‑in Ethereum bridge lets users bring ERC‑20s without custodial risk, and the WasmX module supports CosmWasm smart contracts. INJ holders can stake or participate in governance that controls upgrades like the 2024 Volan hard fork which added liquid staking.
View Full Page$88.02M
Stacks is a Bitcoin Layer‑2 secured by Proof‑of‑Transfer where miners commit BTC to mint STX and anchor blocks to Bitcoin every 10–15 minutes. Clarity smart contracts enable DeFi with Bitcoin finality, and the sBTC proposal aims to bring a two‑way peg for native BTC on chain. The Nakamoto upgrade scheduled for 2025 will reduce block times to five seconds and add probabilistic Bitcoin finality.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Injective
TVL$9.23M
24h Volume$56.3K
24h Fees$21.3K
24h Revenue$21.3K
30d Fees$487.4K
30d Revenue$487.4K
7d TVL Change-15.17%
Dominance0.00%
Stacks
TVL$88.02M
24h Volume$0
24h Fees$0
24h Revenue$0
30d Fees$205
30d Revenue$41
7d TVL Change+1.40%
Dominance0.03%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Injective
9.5%Stacks
90.5%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Injective
100.0%Stacks
1.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Injective
100.0%Stacks
1.0%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Injective
100.0%Stacks
1.0%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Injective
-15.17%Stacks
1.40%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Injective
0.0%Stacks
0.0%TVL Comparison
Injective
Stacks