Injective vs Stacks
Compare Injective and Stacks on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$14.26M
Injective is a Cosmos‑SDK Layer‑1 with on‑chain order books, zero‑gas trading and a frequent batch auction that mitigates MEV. Its built‑in Ethereum bridge lets users bring ERC‑20s without custodial risk, and the WasmX module supports CosmWasm smart contracts. INJ holders can stake or participate in governance that controls upgrades like the 2024 Volan hard fork which added liquid staking.
View Full Page$91M
Stacks is a Bitcoin Layer‑2 secured by Proof‑of‑Transfer where miners commit BTC to mint STX and anchor blocks to Bitcoin every 10–15 minutes. Clarity smart contracts enable DeFi with Bitcoin finality, and the sBTC proposal aims to bring a two‑way peg for native BTC on chain. The Nakamoto upgrade scheduled for 2025 will reduce block times to five seconds and add probabilistic Bitcoin finality.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Injective
TVL$14.26M
24h Volume$5.03M
24h Fees$488
24h Revenue$151
30d Fees$33.7K
30d Revenue$8.7K
7d TVL Change+20.34%
Dominance0.01%
Stacks
TVL$91M
24h Volume$704.6K
24h Fees$4.1K
24h Revenue$1.7K
30d Fees$254K
30d Revenue$124K
7d TVL Change-1.36%
Dominance0.03%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Injective
13.5%Stacks
86.5%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Injective
87.7%Stacks
12.3%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Injective
10.7%Stacks
89.3%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Injective
8.4%Stacks
91.6%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Injective
20.34%Stacks
-1.36%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Injective
0.0%Stacks
0.0%TVL Comparison
Injective
Stacks