Injective vs TON
Compare Injective and TON on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$9.19M
Injective is a Cosmos‑SDK Layer‑1 with on‑chain order books, zero‑gas trading and a frequent batch auction that mitigates MEV. Its built‑in Ethereum bridge lets users bring ERC‑20s without custodial risk, and the WasmX module supports CosmWasm smart contracts. INJ holders can stake or participate in governance that controls upgrades like the 2024 Volan hard fork which added liquid staking.
View Full Page$49.35M
The Open Network (TON) is a sharded Layer‑1 originally designed by Telegram, featuring dynamic workchains and instant cross‑shard consensus through the Vertical Blockchain mechanism. The TON Storage and TON DNS services extend functionality beyond payments, whereas the Tap‑to‑Transfer feature has onboarded millions of Telegram users. A 2025 governance vote approved jetton fee burns to make TON mildly deflationary.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Injective
TVL$9.19M
24h Volume$56.3K
24h Fees$21.3K
24h Revenue$21.3K
30d Fees$487.4K
30d Revenue$487.4K
7d TVL Change-15.17%
Dominance0.00%
TON
TVL$49.35M
24h Volume$3.27M
24h Fees$11.4K
24h Revenue$2.5K
30d Fees$316.5K
30d Revenue$72.4K
7d TVL Change-5.66%
Dominance0.02%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Injective
15.7%TON
84.3%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Injective
1.7%TON
98.3%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Injective
65.1%TON
34.9%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Injective
89.5%TON
10.5%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Injective
-15.17%TON
-5.66%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Injective
0.0%TON
0.0%TVL Comparison
Injective
TON