Injective vs Tempo
Compare Injective and Tempo on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$16.34M
Injective is a Cosmos‑SDK Layer‑1 with on‑chain order books, zero‑gas trading and a frequent batch auction that mitigates MEV. Its built‑in Ethereum bridge lets users bring ERC‑20s without custodial risk, and the WasmX module supports CosmWasm smart contracts. INJ holders can stake or participate in governance that controls upgrades like the 2024 Volan hard fork which added liquid staking.
View Full Page$109.54M
Tempo is a layer 1 blockchain incubated by Stripe and Paradigm and purpose-built for payments. It is EVM-compatible and designed for high throughput and low, predictable fees that can be paid directly in stablecoins, without a volatile native gas token. Tempo provides payment-oriented features such as dedicated payment lanes, memo fields for reconciliation and built-in stablecoin exchange, aimed at use cases like global payouts, remittances, embedded finance and agentic payments. It is developed with design partners from payments, fintech and e-commerce.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Injective
TVL$16.34M
24h Volume$3.02M
24h Fees$301
24h Revenue$137
30d Fees$67.3K
30d Revenue$31.4K
7d TVL Change+16.10%
Dominance0.02%
Tempo
TVL$109.54M
24h Volume$854.7K
24h Fees$150
24h Revenue$1
30d Fees$4.4K
30d Revenue$33
7d TVL Change+19.68%
Dominance0.12%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Injective
13.0%Tempo
87.0%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Injective
77.9%Tempo
22.1%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Injective
66.8%Tempo
33.2%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Injective
99.3%Tempo
1.0%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Injective
16.10%Tempo
19.68%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Injective
0.0%Tempo
0.1%TVL Comparison
Injective
Tempo