Injective vs Unichain

Compare Injective and Unichain on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$14.63M
Injective is a Cosmos‑SDK Layer‑1 with on‑chain order books, zero‑gas trading and a frequent batch auction that mitigates MEV. Its built‑in Ethereum bridge lets users bring ERC‑20s without custodial risk, and the WasmX module supports CosmWasm smart contracts. INJ holders can stake or participate in governance that controls upgrades like the 2024 Volan hard fork which added liquid staking.
View Full Page
$26.46M
Unichain is an OP‑Stack Layer‑2 built by Uniswap Labs that employs a trusted‑execution‑environment (TEE) block builder to guarantee ordered execution free from MEV. Liquidity pools enjoy baked‑in sandwich protection, and the UNI token governs sequencer whitelists. The chain inherited native hooks from upcoming Uniswap V4, enabling dynamic fee models.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Injective
TVL
$14.63M
24h Volume
$5.03M
24h Fees
$488
24h Revenue
$151
30d Fees
$33.7K
30d Revenue
$8.7K
7d TVL Change
+20.34%
Dominance
0.01%
Unichain
TVL
$26.46M
24h Volume
$18.18M
24h Fees
$41.6K
24h Revenue
$38
30d Fees
$728.6K
30d Revenue
$19.9K
7d TVL Change
-2.00%
Dominance
0.01%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Injective
35.6%
Unichain
64.4%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Injective
21.7%
Unichain
78.3%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Injective
1.2%
Unichain
98.8%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Injective
80.0%
Unichain
20.0%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Injective
20.34%
Unichain
-2.00%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Injective
0.0%
Unichain
0.0%
TVL Comparison
Injective
Unichain