Manta vs Movement
Compare Manta and Movement on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$3.48M
Manta Pacific is a modular zk‑EVM Layer‑2 that stores rollup data on Celestia DA and uses universal circuits to keep prover costs low. Users can deploy privacy‑preserving smart contracts with built‑in zero‑knowledge widgets for shielding balances. The 2025 ‘Marlin’ release adds Account Abstraction and native bridges to Polkadot’s parachain ecosystem.
View Full Page$3.03M
Movement is a Move-based blockchain network designed to bring the security and performance of the Move programming language to the Ethereum ecosystem. Built with a modular architecture, it combines MoveVM execution with Ethereum compatibility, enabling developers to build scalable decentralized applications while accessing Ethereum’s liquidity and infrastructure. Movement focuses on high throughput, fast finality, and interoperability between Move and EVM ecosystems.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Manta
TVL$3.48M
24h Volume$9.94M
24h Fees$3.8K
24h Revenue$1.1K
30d Fees$41.8K
30d Revenue$6.2K
7d TVL Change-6.11%
Dominance0.00%
Movement
TVL$3.03M
24h Volume$1K
24h Fees$1.6K
24h Revenue$589
30d Fees$64.7K
30d Revenue$23.9K
7d TVL Change-16.82%
Dominance0.00%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Manta
53.4%Movement
46.6%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Manta
100.0%Movement
1.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Manta
70.3%Movement
29.7%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Manta
65.0%Movement
35.0%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Manta
-6.11%Movement
-16.82%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Manta
0.0%Movement
0.0%TVL Comparison
Manta
Movement