Manta vs Vaulta

Compare Manta and Vaulta on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$3.46M
Manta Pacific is a modular zk‑EVM Layer‑2 that stores rollup data on Celestia DA and uses universal circuits to keep prover costs low. Users can deploy privacy‑preserving smart contracts with built‑in zero‑knowledge widgets for shielding balances. The 2025 ‘Marlin’ release adds Account Abstraction and native bridges to Polkadot’s parachain ecosystem.
View Full Page
$36.09M
Vaulta is a Layer-1 chain built as the operating system for Web3 banking. It combines a high-performance, deterministic-finality blockchain with modules for wealth management, consumer payments, portfolio investment, and crypto-native insurance. Fully EVM-compatible, Vaulta supports Bitcoin integration via ExSat, cross-chain transfers through IBC, and a staking-backed stable financial infrastructure for institutions and individuals.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Manta
TVL
$3.46M
24h Volume
$9.94M
24h Fees
$3.8K
24h Revenue
$1.1K
30d Fees
$41.8K
30d Revenue
$6.2K
7d TVL Change
-6.11%
Dominance
0.00%
Vaulta
TVL
$36.09M
24h Volume
$9.7K
24h Fees
$17.9K
24h Revenue
$3.6K
30d Fees
$394.9K
30d Revenue
$79K
7d TVL Change
+2.23%
Dominance
0.01%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Manta
8.7%
Vaulta
91.3%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Manta
99.9%
Vaulta
1.0%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Manta
17.3%
Vaulta
82.7%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Manta
23.4%
Vaulta
76.6%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Manta
-6.11%
Vaulta
2.23%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Manta
0.0%
Vaulta
0.0%
TVL Comparison
Manta
Vaulta