PulseChain vs TON
Compare PulseChain and TON on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$50.43M
$48.37M
The Open Network (TON) is a sharded Layer‑1 originally designed by Telegram, featuring dynamic workchains and instant cross‑shard consensus through the Vertical Blockchain mechanism. The TON Storage and TON DNS services extend functionality beyond payments, whereas the Tap‑to‑Transfer feature has onboarded millions of Telegram users. A 2025 governance vote approved jetton fee burns to make TON mildly deflationary.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
PulseChain
TVL$50.43M
24h Volume$4.07M
24h Fees$14.7K
24h Revenue$10.7K
30d Fees$594.2K
30d Revenue$405.7K
7d TVL Change-36.97%
Dominance0.05%
TON
TVL$48.37M
24h Volume$2.16M
24h Fees$1.27M
24h Revenue$24.5K
30d Fees$32.85M
30d Revenue$931.9K
7d TVL Change-3.66%
Dominance0.05%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
PulseChain
51.0%TON
49.0%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
PulseChain
65.3%TON
34.7%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
PulseChain
1.1%TON
98.9%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
PulseChain
30.3%TON
69.7%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
PulseChain
-36.97%TON
-3.66%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
PulseChain
0.1%TON
0.1%TVL Comparison
PulseChain
TON